Skip to main content

What Do Patients Know About Their Medications?

Physicians have great responsibility to protect the health of their patients.  But the practice of medicine is a shared responsibility.  Patients – the major stakeholders – obviously have responsibility for their own health.  In my view, they are charged with questioning and understanding the rationale of proposed medical advice.  I do my best to explain my advice clearly.  If there are reasonable alternatives, then I present them.  But if the patient before me remains unclear on the situation, then he needs to ask me to repeat and clarify.   Patients must exercise personal responsibility.

If a surgeon enters an exam room and tells you that surgery is scheduled for the following morning, I would hope that you would be fully informed on what operation is planned and why it is necessary.  It sounds absurd that a patient would consent to an unspecified surgery. 



"Ready for pot luck surgery tomorrow?"


And yet, I regularly see patients who have no idea why they are taking certain medicines.  (I admit that many of their medication lists are so long, that they would need to carry an Excel spreadsheet with them to keep track!)  I don’t expect patients to know the chemical structure of their medicines, but I do think that they should know their general purpose. 

A few days prior to penning this, I saw a patient taking Eliquis, a potent blood thinner.  This medicine was of interest to me as it would need to be temporarily held before his upcoming colonoscopy.  It wasn’t clear to me from his chart why he required a blood thinning agent, so I resorted to a time-tested method to find the truth.  I asked him. 

He wasn’t sure why he was taking the medicine.  It was prescribed a year ago by his orthopedist at the time of hip surgery to prevent a blood clot, a complication that he thankfully avoided.  In this situation, the blood thinner is usually prescribed as a temporary measure.  I thought that there were 2 explanations to this puzzling situation.
  • Through medical oversight, he was never advised to stop the blood thinner.
  • The patient needs the blood thinner for another reason not known by him.
I directed him to contact his primary care physician for clarification.  He did so and contacted me back as I requested to explain that he did, in fact, have a cardiac condition that warranted this drug.

So, no foul, but, why didn’t he know this?  Did the doctor fail to inform him?  Did the patient simply forget?  Regardless of where the blame lies, this patient should have known why he was swallowing down a chemical each day.   Look over your own medication list.  Can you explain the medical necessity for each one of them?  If not, might I suggest a time-tested method to find the truth?  Ask your doctor.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...