Skip to main content

What Do Patients Know About Their Medications?

Physicians have great responsibility to protect the health of their patients.  But the practice of medicine is a shared responsibility.  Patients – the major stakeholders – obviously have responsibility for their own health.  In my view, they are charged with questioning and understanding the rationale of proposed medical advice.  I do my best to explain my advice clearly.  If there are reasonable alternatives, then I present them.  But if the patient before me remains unclear on the situation, then he needs to ask me to repeat and clarify.   Patients must exercise personal responsibility.

If a surgeon enters an exam room and tells you that surgery is scheduled for the following morning, I would hope that you would be fully informed on what operation is planned and why it is necessary.  It sounds absurd that a patient would consent to an unspecified surgery. 



"Ready for pot luck surgery tomorrow?"


And yet, I regularly see patients who have no idea why they are taking certain medicines.  (I admit that many of their medication lists are so long, that they would need to carry an Excel spreadsheet with them to keep track!)  I don’t expect patients to know the chemical structure of their medicines, but I do think that they should know their general purpose. 

A few days prior to penning this, I saw a patient taking Eliquis, a potent blood thinner.  This medicine was of interest to me as it would need to be temporarily held before his upcoming colonoscopy.  It wasn’t clear to me from his chart why he required a blood thinning agent, so I resorted to a time-tested method to find the truth.  I asked him. 

He wasn’t sure why he was taking the medicine.  It was prescribed a year ago by his orthopedist at the time of hip surgery to prevent a blood clot, a complication that he thankfully avoided.  In this situation, the blood thinner is usually prescribed as a temporary measure.  I thought that there were 2 explanations to this puzzling situation.
  • Through medical oversight, he was never advised to stop the blood thinner.
  • The patient needs the blood thinner for another reason not known by him.
I directed him to contact his primary care physician for clarification.  He did so and contacted me back as I requested to explain that he did, in fact, have a cardiac condition that warranted this drug.

So, no foul, but, why didn’t he know this?  Did the doctor fail to inform him?  Did the patient simply forget?  Regardless of where the blame lies, this patient should have known why he was swallowing down a chemical each day.   Look over your own medication list.  Can you explain the medical necessity for each one of them?  If not, might I suggest a time-tested method to find the truth?  Ask your doctor.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary