Fake News - Why are We So Gullible?

It’s certain that you have heard the phrase ‘Fake News’ bandied about these past few years. It seems there is no consensus defining this term. Here are a few differing interpretations.

Inaccurate reporting where minor, immaterial errors appear, but the essence of the story remains true. For example, if an article wrongly names a restaurant where a meeting is held, the article should not crumble.
Deliberately slanted reporting to serve a political agenda. I do believe that this happens daily. Reporters and editors are charged to compartmentalize their own views, similar to judges, but they are human like the rest of us. The next time you open a newspaper, read the headlines carefully and you will find examples of wording that is less than fair and balanced
News reports that are completely on the level, but are attacked by those whom are threatened by the reporting. I don’t feel that I need to give examples here.

Fake or On the Level?

A close cousin of Fake News is gullibility. Folks today tend to believe what they read and hear, even if the position is untested or even disproven. Remember how many diehards maintain that certain vaccines caused autism even though this linkage was thoroughly and repeated debunked by the scientific community?

Several times each week I have to reassure my heartburn patients that their medicines will not corrode their bones or lead them to kidney dialysis. A screaming headline, Nexium Linked to Hip Fractures, may gain clicks, but it is misleading and not based on scientific facts.

Our gullibility is exploited when malicious foreigners and those among us load Facebook and other social media sites with false and provocative information to divide and confuse us. And, it works. We are all too ready to accept as fact what is truly fake news hiding under camouflage.

I am not excusing the purveyors of Fake News or those who falsely assign this label to truthful reporting. But, don’t we – the consumers of news – have an obligation to perform some measure of due diligence?

Comments

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and studying, two longstanding personal pleasures, could be ext

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients? Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession? Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease. This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses. So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit. Physicians, after all, are members of the human species. A pulmon

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier. There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform. Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele. It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance. For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings? If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits? The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform. Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat. The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families. Indeed, even today

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog