Skip to main content

Twilight Sedation or Propofol - Choose Your Poison!

There are two ways to sedate patients for colonoscopy.  There is conscious sedation is when the gastroenterologist administers a ‘twilight sedation’, or moderate sedation when sedation is administered by an anesthesia professional, usually with propofol, a drug now known to most of us as  a contributor to the death of pop superstar Michael Jackson.


Most Patients Prefer Propofol over the Twilight Zone


Leaving issues of cost aside, most individuals involved in the colonoscopy experience prefers the propofol option.  Here’s why.

The drug is extremely safe when administered by trained personnel, who in most cases are Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs).

Unlike with twilight anesthesia, the procedure is entirely painless.  Patients can expect to experience the same level of discomfort as they do with a haircut.

Knowing that they face complete comfort during the procedure, patients are relieved of anxiety that often precedes the procedure for several days or longer.

With a CRNA on the team, we have a professional at the bedside whose sole responsibility is to monitor the patient’s breathing and to make necessary adjustments in real time.

The endoscopy nurse, a seasoned R.N. professional, can now devote all of his or her attention to assisting the gastroenterologist and monitoring the patient knowing that the patient’s respiratory status and sedation are fully under the CRNA’s authority.

Recovery after the procedure is quicker and cleaner than with twilight.  In fact, patients often feel so well afterward, that we have to emphasize that they are still under the influence and are not quite ready to drive a car, fly a plane or command a nuclear submarine until the next morning. 

Using CRNA’s add to the cost of the procedure because these professionals are entitled to be paid for the work that they do.  Is it extra cost worth all of the benefits I have outlined?  As a patient, would you be willing to pay for the CRNA’s services out of pocket if your insurance company, who cares only for your health and welfare, only covered conscious ‘twilight’ sedation’?  Which option would insurance company executives or Medicare administrators prefer for themselves?   Perhaps, they would be more enlightened and empathic if they had to undergo sedation in the ‘Twilight Zone’ before issuing an edict declaring how much your safety and comfort are worth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and studying, two longstanding personal pleasures, could be ext

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of the human species.  A pulmon

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today