Skip to main content

Twilight Sedation or Propofol - Choose Your Poison!

There are two ways to sedate patients for colonoscopy.  There is conscious sedation is when the gastroenterologist administers a ‘twilight sedation’, or moderate sedation when sedation is administered by an anesthesia professional, usually with propofol, a drug now known to most of us as  a contributor to the death of pop superstar Michael Jackson.


Most Patients Prefer Propofol over the Twilight Zone


Leaving issues of cost aside, most individuals involved in the colonoscopy experience prefers the propofol option.  Here’s why.

The drug is extremely safe when administered by trained personnel, who in most cases are Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs).

Unlike with twilight anesthesia, the procedure is entirely painless.  Patients can expect to experience the same level of discomfort as they do with a haircut.

Knowing that they face complete comfort during the procedure, patients are relieved of anxiety that often precedes the procedure for several days or longer.

With a CRNA on the team, we have a professional at the bedside whose sole responsibility is to monitor the patient’s breathing and to make necessary adjustments in real time.

The endoscopy nurse, a seasoned R.N. professional, can now devote all of his or her attention to assisting the gastroenterologist and monitoring the patient knowing that the patient’s respiratory status and sedation are fully under the CRNA’s authority.

Recovery after the procedure is quicker and cleaner than with twilight.  In fact, patients often feel so well afterward, that we have to emphasize that they are still under the influence and are not quite ready to drive a car, fly a plane or command a nuclear submarine until the next morning. 

Using CRNA’s add to the cost of the procedure because these professionals are entitled to be paid for the work that they do.  Is it extra cost worth all of the benefits I have outlined?  As a patient, would you be willing to pay for the CRNA’s services out of pocket if your insurance company, who cares only for your health and welfare, only covered conscious ‘twilight’ sedation’?  Which option would insurance company executives or Medicare administrators prefer for themselves?   Perhaps, they would be more enlightened and empathic if they had to undergo sedation in the ‘Twilight Zone’ before issuing an edict declaring how much your safety and comfort are worth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary