Skip to main content

Hospital Discharge Planning - Is the Hospital Sending You Home Too Soon?

In 1990, Desert Storm was initiated by President George H.W. Bush, along with coalition partners to reverse Saddam Hussein’s aggression with respect to Kuwait.  As American and allied forces moved into Iraq, many hawks wanted these forces to advance to Baghdad, and drive out Saddam Hussein.  As we all know, President Bush pulled us out as he did not feel this objective was part of the mission.  He knew when to get out.

Now, physicians are not military strategists, but there are parallels between military strategy and patient care, particularly when a patient is hospitalized.  Consider the following schema.  

The Conflict:  A patient arrives in the emergency room with a cough and a fever. 
The Mission: Disease eradication
The Tactics:  Hospitalization
Exit Strategy:  Getting the patient out.

Physicians, just like the generals in the Situation Room in the White House, need a sound battle plan.  The plan must be flexible enough to adapt to changing contingencies and unforeseen events.  I have found that explaining the Exit Strategy to patients and their families can be a challenging undertaking, in contrast to explaining the tactical decision to hospitalize someone.  For example, if a physician recommends hospitalization because this option is felt to be safer and appropriate, then patients and families readily accept this.  (Ordinary folks would not be expected to consider the risks of hospitalization with regard to infections, errors, sleep deprivation and excessive medical testing, but let’s leave this aside for now.)

In my experience, patients and their families need and deserve a detailed explanation from the doctor when hospital discharge is advised.  Here are some points that I cover during my Exit Strategy discussion.

Choose a Physician Who Can Predict the Future

Discharge home does not mean that the individual is 100% cured.  It means that the medical team believes that the recovery can safely continue at home or at an interim facility.  Hospitals are now equipped with teams of home care medical professionals, social workers and therapists to continue care and treatment after discharge.  In the olden days, patients would be fully recovered during their hospital stay, and might even linger a day or two longer because they could.

Every extra hospital day, as I noted above, carries direct health risks to the patient.  Feel free to Google, C diff, and you will readily understand my point.  Most families are not fully aware of the risks of hospital life.

Despite our extensive medical training, physicians were not taught the art of clairvoyance.   This is a serious oversight by medical educators as this skill would have enabled us to be much better physicians.  Hopefully, as medical education reform continues, students will be taught this practice so they will know exactly when to prescribe, when to operate, when to observe and when to refer to a colleague.  I take special effort at discharge to explain to patients and families that we are not fortune tellers. We know only what we know, not what will be.  If we knew, for example, that Granny would take a turn for the worse 3 days after we sent her home, then we would not have discharged her.  While physicians can certainly discharge a patient too soon, the fact that a patient’s condition worsens after discharge does not automatically mean the decision to discharge was wrong or premature.  I think it’s important that patients and their families buy in to the rationale and timing of hospital discharge.  If they haven't, and Granny's condition goes south in a few days, then the physician may face an irate family or be relieved of command.

The best generals and the best physicians are those that know when their mission has been accomplished and how to extract their people out safely.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) Durin...