Skip to main content

Hospital Discharge Planning - Is the Hospital Sending You Home Too Soon?

In 1990, Desert Storm was initiated by President George H.W. Bush, along with coalition partners to reverse Saddam Hussein’s aggression with respect to Kuwait.  As American and allied forces moved into Iraq, many hawks wanted these forces to advance to Baghdad, and drive out Saddam Hussein.  As we all know, President Bush pulled us out as he did not feel this objective was part of the mission.  He knew when to get out.

Now, physicians are not military strategists, but there are parallels between military strategy and patient care, particularly when a patient is hospitalized.  Consider the following schema.  

The Conflict:  A patient arrives in the emergency room with a cough and a fever. 
The Mission: Disease eradication
The Tactics:  Hospitalization
Exit Strategy:  Getting the patient out.

Physicians, just like the generals in the Situation Room in the White House, need a sound battle plan.  The plan must be flexible enough to adapt to changing contingencies and unforeseen events.  I have found that explaining the Exit Strategy to patients and their families can be a challenging undertaking, in contrast to explaining the tactical decision to hospitalize someone.  For example, if a physician recommends hospitalization because this option is felt to be safer and appropriate, then patients and families readily accept this.  (Ordinary folks would not be expected to consider the risks of hospitalization with regard to infections, errors, sleep deprivation and excessive medical testing, but let’s leave this aside for now.)

In my experience, patients and their families need and deserve a detailed explanation from the doctor when hospital discharge is advised.  Here are some points that I cover during my Exit Strategy discussion.

Choose a Physician Who Can Predict the Future

Discharge home does not mean that the individual is 100% cured.  It means that the medical team believes that the recovery can safely continue at home or at an interim facility.  Hospitals are now equipped with teams of home care medical professionals, social workers and therapists to continue care and treatment after discharge.  In the olden days, patients would be fully recovered during their hospital stay, and might even linger a day or two longer because they could.

Every extra hospital day, as I noted above, carries direct health risks to the patient.  Feel free to Google, C diff, and you will readily understand my point.  Most families are not fully aware of the risks of hospital life.

Despite our extensive medical training, physicians were not taught the art of clairvoyance.   This is a serious oversight by medical educators as this skill would have enabled us to be much better physicians.  Hopefully, as medical education reform continues, students will be taught this practice so they will know exactly when to prescribe, when to operate, when to observe and when to refer to a colleague.  I take special effort at discharge to explain to patients and families that we are not fortune tellers. We know only what we know, not what will be.  If we knew, for example, that Granny would take a turn for the worse 3 days after we sent her home, then we would not have discharged her.  While physicians can certainly discharge a patient too soon, the fact that a patient’s condition worsens after discharge does not automatically mean the decision to discharge was wrong or premature.  I think it’s important that patients and their families buy in to the rationale and timing of hospital discharge.  If they haven't, and Granny's condition goes south in a few days, then the physician may face an irate family or be relieved of command.

The best generals and the best physicians are those that know when their mission has been accomplished and how to extract their people out safely.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary