Skip to main content

Donald Trump and the Butterfly Effect

We are all familiar with the ‘butterfly effect’, describing a phenomenon when a seemingly trivial action – a whisper, a smile, a compliment or the fluttering of a butterfly’s wing – causes a soft ripple that can reach a distant continent.  You simply cannot calculate the power and reach of a simple act of kindness. Here’s how it works. 

You are in line waiting to buy your first coffee of the day and you discover that the stranger ahead of you has paid for your order.  You are moved by this this simple act of generosity.  Your mood elevates.  You wonder why such an idea never occurred to you.  You ruminate over this on your drive to work.  You greet your secretary who has been under stress and very distracted over her spouse who is recovering at home after surgery.  You think about what that must be like for her and her family.  It’s Thursday morning and you send her home for the rest of the work week so she can help her spouse get well.  The secretary is overcome with gratitude.  After her return to work, she feels that she wants to emulate the kindness that you showed her.  See receives yet another e-mail from her local food bank, only this time she feels the urge to participate and she does so.  Three families she will never meet will now receive food.  A child from one of these families ends up becoming very wealthy and makes it her mission to give back.  And, with a hope and a prayer, the chain keeps extending one link at a time.


The flutter of a wing can change the world.

Of course, the butterfly effect can also create a chain that leads to darkness.  The impact of an unkind remark a scowl, idle gossip  or a vengeful act can reach far beyond the original action.  Since the ultimate negative effects appear unconnected to the first action, the creator of the first link in this dark chain is unaware that he bears some responsibility for the damage that he seeded.

What might the cumulative effects be of leaders who failed to step up for truth, dismissed and excused dishonesty, supported those who trafficked in baseless conspiracy fantasies, rejected mask wearing and other public health measures during a pandemic, challenged the results of a repeatedly verified presidential election, told an alt-rite group with a history of violence to 'stand back and stand by', fired government officials whose transgression was to tell the truth, whipped up tens of millions of supporters to ‘take back our county’ and voted to reject a state’s electoral vote count?

You don’t think that all of this could lead to a violent insurrection, do you?

As of a few days ago, there's a new butterfly in town. 

Comments

  1. You are very right about the "ripple" effect of actions!!
    That being said, it is also true that many thousands of us who voted for Trump NEVER liked the way he fought back all the time, but he did more great things for this country than many had in the past!! And let's remember that he was attacked by the Dems and the Fake News even before he took office!! We so wish he had been so much more articulate and "Presidential", but he is not a Politician and that is exactly what this country needs!! He truly cares about the working class!!
    Please know that thousands and thousands of us who liked what he did for this country don't nor ever will act out like you think would be the ripple effect!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. @anonymous, I appreciate your thoughtful comments and hope to see your voice again on the blog. All the best, MK

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary