Skip to main content

Deaths From Medical Errors: Hell or Hype?

Doctors make mistakes.  There, I’ve said it.  More than having said it, I wrote it.  This confession has now been memorialized in cyberspace, where no piece of data can ever be truly deleted.  We have all seen how seemingly erased data has been resurrected by forensic experts to the horror and dismay of the eraser wannabees.

Doctors work on seriously ill patients.  They do their best to help heal them; or when this is not possible, to comfort them.  Some patients get worse under our care.  Some die.  This sober slice of the human condition impacts deeply on physicians and all health care professionals.

I acknowledge that medical errors have worsened patients’ condition or have even contributed or caused their demise, a tragic but unavoidable result of a noble endeavor that is imperfect.  I remind readers that physicians are members of the human species and have all of the flaws and frailties that every other homo sapiens creature possesses.   Every aspect of the profession is imperfect – physicians, nurses, medical devices, drugs, surgical equipment, hospital sanitation and the various processes and procedures involving scheduling, administering of drugs and blood products and labeling of specimen jars.  Indeed, no profession can boast 100% performance, although admittedly the stakes are higher in the medical arena than in many others.

Air Travel is not 100% Safe

Nearly 20 years ago, a report appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association that stated that nearly 100,000 patients died as a consequence of medical mistakes.  Last year, the British Medical Journal raises this number to 250,000.  Many have challenged the accuracy of both of these reports, claiming that the quality of the studies’ interpretations is suspect.  While I have no opinion here on this challenge, I do offer two observations, neither of which is scientific.
  • In my quarter century of medical practice, I have not witnessed a medical act or omission that clearly caused a patient’s death.   Of course, I have seen, and surely committed, plenty of mistakes and flawed judgments, but I cannot recall any medical act or decision that was the proximate cause of a patient’s death.
  • It’s not a simple task to determine if a medical error was either responsible or a major contributor to a patient’s death.  For example, consider an elderly patient with history of a stroke and heart disease who is in an intensive care unit for pneumonia who is on a ventilator. A doctor mistakenly prescribes an excess of intravenous fluids and the patient develops congestive heart failure (CHF).  The CHF is treated but the patient’s condition deteriorates over the next 3 days leading to his death.  It’s not easy to accurately ascertain in this hypothetical example to what extent the doctor’s error contributed to the outcome of this seriously ill and elderly individual.   
I’m not carrying water for my profession.  Rather than fight over how many deaths doctors are responsible for, let’s work together on our shared mission to make our health care as safe as we can.  

Comments

  1. Could you please help us with our petition for whistleblowing physicians in Maine? We hope to get enough supporters that an investigation will take place. Thanks Dr. Kirsch.

    https://www.change.org/p/good-healthcare-workers-need-your-help

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary