Skip to main content

When will there be a Coronavirus Vaccine?



We are all hopeful that effective treatments against COVID-19 will emerge in the next 1-2 years.  The first round of medicines will be replaced with superior alternatives.  This is called progress.  But as of now, we have no effective therapy.  I have already expressed my skepticism over chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, whose popularity and usage had skyrocketed despite the absence of credible and persuasive medical evidence of efficacy, but the initial sugar-high has dampened.  Clinical trials are in progress on various agents and will bring some clarity to the issue.  

Scientists throughout the world are working doggedly to create an effective vaccine.  This won’t be easy.  The forecasts of an effective vaccine in 12-18 months may prove to be wildly optimistic.  Consider that the common cold which tortures tens of millions of us every year is also caused by a coronavirus.  No protective vaccine against cold viruses has been created and scientists have had decades to devise one.  Apparently, it must not be easy.   Keep in mind that some vaccines, such as the ‘flu shot’, only offer partial protection against a wily viral adversary.   Viruses can also mutate which can render an existing vaccine much less effective.   My point is that we should support and fund the creation of a vaccine – which might be our most potent anti-viral weapon – but we should be humbled by the task. 


Still no vaccine for the common cold.  


The overwhelmingly best strategy in the foreseeable future is to avoid infection.  Increasingly, we are being instructed to wear masks, although these  recommendations have evolved.  Current thinking is that a decent mask protects others and the mask wearer.  

I am doing my best to maintain consistent social distancing and those in my house are doing the same.  Yes, it may be low tech, but it’s the best strategy we have right now.  Yes, I do believe that several vaccines will emerge, but it may take longer than we have been told to expect and the ultimate safety and efficacy data may be less favorable than the initial claims.  So, until then, wear a mask and keep your distance.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...