Imagine that you are a physician and the patient sitting
before you has no medical insurance. This means, of course, that this
individual will have to pay personally for the costs of blood tests, radiology
studies, consults with medical specialists, prescriptions, diagnostic tests and
even surgeries. What do you think it
might cost your patient if he is suffering from issues such as chest pain,
weight loss, abdominal pain or dizziness?
Standard evaluations for these medical symptoms can cost many thousands of
dollars.
Medical Care Ain't Cheap
So, assuming you are the doctor, how would you modify your
advice to be sensitive to your patient’s sober financial realities?
Which of the following modifications would you support for a
patient who has no insurance?
- Instead of ordering a stress test for chest pain, prescribe heart medicine to see if this resolves the issue.
- Instead of sending the patient to the Emergency Room for a question of appendicitis, prescribe an antibiotic and have the patient see you in the office in 24-48 hours to reassess him.
- Instead of referring the patient for a colonoscopy to evaluate rectal bleeding, prescribe medicine for hemorrhoids to see if this controls the bleeding.
A patient’s financial status should have no bearing on the
medical advice. Indeed, to modify it
would be a breach of medical ethics and professionalism. Every
patient is entitled to the physician’s best medical advice, regardless of cost
or ability to pay. Sympathy for a
patient’s personal circumstances, while understandable, must not taint the medical
advice.
The patient, however, may opt to decline the doctor’s
recommendation for cost reasons. This is
perfectly acceptable and understandable.
So, if a millionaire or an uninsured person comes to me for
advice, I can’t guarantee that my recommendation will be perfect, but I assure
you that the advice for each would be the same.
Insightful as always, Michael. However, I would very to suggest that perhaps this is always not so clear cut and you may participate in some “shared decision making” about what to do next to be effective and as cost aware as possible!
ReplyDelete@Elliot, well said! And while we agree that such a patient may opt for a compromise of sorts, I presume we also agree that the patient should be informed of what the optimal recommendation is, leaving cost issues aside. Appreciate your thoughts, as always.
Delete