Skip to main content

Have doctors lost our physical exam skills?


Does your doctor really know how to use a stethoscope or palpate your abdomen?

Today’s physicians do not have the physical exam skills that our predecessors did.  We can argue if this has diminished medical quality. I’m not sure that it has.  But it has completely changed how medicine today is practiced.  The reason for declining physical exam skills is that technology has to a significant extent supplanted physicians’ hands, eyes and ears.  In the olden days, the stethoscope was the diagnostic tool for examining hearts.  Ask your doctor when was the last time he or she percussed the abdomen.  I spent a month as a medical student with a legendary cardiologist who could make all kinds of cardiac diagnoses right at the bedside using 2 advanced medical instruments known as ears.  Surgeons and gastroenterologists in years past had to make  diagnoses of acute appendicitis and other abdominal emergencies based on feel and their ‘gut’.  Neurologists made accurate diagnoses of stroke just using their clinical skills.


An Advanced Medical Instrument

These days, there is really no need to be a sleuth with a stethoscope since any murmur or extra click heard by a human will be followed by an echocardiogram.  I can’t recall a case of appendicitis in my career that didn’t involve a CAT scan to confirm a surgeon’s suspicion.   And, if a stroke is suspected, a head CAT scan will be arranged.

Since, medical technology has in many cases taken over the physical examination, doctors’ hands-on skills have decayed.  There is much less pressure for our exam skills to be superb since we know that some rescue scan or diagnostic test that does it better will follow.  Conversely, if a physician were seeing a patient with stomach pain, and there was no technology available, I surmise that this doctor would do a more careful exam than he otherwise would.  Get my point?

Are patients better served with more accurate technology to make and exclude diagnoses?  Some are and many aren’t.  We all celebrate how technology in medicine has revolutionized the profession and has saved and improved lives.  I rely upon this every day in my practice.  But we must acknowledge that this progress has exacted many costs.  Poorly or hastily chosen diagnostic tests can lead patients down false pathways.  A CAT scan is not a physician.  It does not understand the nuances of the patient’s situation.  It cannot place the the scan’s finding in context of a living breathing human being. It’s data to be considered by the medical professional along with many other clinical factors.  What if the scan, for example, suggests Crohn's disease but the sentient physician knows this is not the case. 

Will there be a  role for medical professionals once artificial intelligence becomes embedded in the medical landscape?  Will AI replace physicians’ cognitive skills just as our physical examination skills have decayed?  Is this just fanciful science fiction?  Here's my own response to these inquiries.  Would you have believed 10 years ago that cars and trucks would be driving themselves?  What seems impossible today may become reality tomorrow.  

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They are starting to change this in medical school. I am a third year in clerkship and at my hospital, one of the "old-timers" who is the director of medicine, has incorporated PACES for the residency program. We have regular lectures and practice sessions on how to take a history and physical exam driven based diagnosis.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @anonymous, your comment gives me hope...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...