From time to time, patients asks my advice on colonic
hydrotherapy, vigorous sessions of enemas that aim to cleanse the body of
toxins that are reputed to cause a variety of ailments. The logic sounds plausible to interested
patients. Over time, toxins accumulate
and leech into the body wreaking havoc.
Indeed, using the label ‘toxins’ already suggests that these are noxious
agents. If one accepts this premise, it
is entirely logical that cleansing the body of these injurious agents would
have a salutary effect.
Not surprisingly, the health benefits of hydrotherapy
usually target very stubborn and vague symptoms and conditions that
conventional medicine do not treat adequately.
It makes sense that if your own physician is not making sense of your
chronic fatigue, for example, that you would entertain other options. I get this.
Who wouldn’t want to enjoy having more energy, better concentration, an
enhanced immune system or delayed aging?
But, in medicine and in life, just because one pathway seems blocked,
doesn’t mean that an alternative pathway will be a better avenue.
Let the Cleansing Begin!
The reason that I do no actively recommend hydrotherapy is
because there is absolutely no persuasive and credible medical evidence that it
is effective. While their advertising
materials may boast of ‘clinical studies’, there is no firm scientific basis
for their claims. And, these sessions
can be costly as patients are often advised that several visits are necessary
to address years of toxin build up.
If gastroenterologists did believe that the treatment works,
we would be offering it in our ambulatory surgery centers along with our
standard endoscopic amusement activities.
(A cynic might suggest here that if medical insurance covered these
treatments, then we would!)
It may very well be that practitioners of this treatment
believe in the therapy and genuinely want to provide healing. And, I have no doubt that many who undergo
hydrotherapy feel better. I’ll never
talk a patient out of success from my or anyone’s treatment. If a hydrotherapy patient were to tell me
that his depression has eased, I would express great satisfaction over this.
I admit readily that I, along with every other breathing
physician, prescribe treatments and remedies for which no supportive medical
evidence exists. We physicians may sanitize
this fact by claiming that our action is an example of ‘the art of medicine’,
but we are more likely hoping for the placebo effect.
Physicians who deviate from evidence-based
medicine shouldn’t casually criticize other practitioners who practice off the
grid, particularly when patients have great faith in complimentary and
integrative medicine.
However, all of us who claim to be healers should aspire for
supportive scientific evidence for our recommendations, and we should admit to
patients when such evidence is lacking.
If you opt for periodic colonic cleanses, and you perceive a
personal benefit, then be aware that you are engaging in an ‘art’, and not a
science.
I love your take on how to handle alternative therapies. Too many doctors put down what they don't know about or can't explain. If it is not hurting, why not?
ReplyDelete@Lucas, thanks for the comment. I agree that many physicians are arrogant about complimentary medicine, even when many of our 'conventional treatments' are not based on solid evidence. With regard to your comment, "if it is not hurting...", I do think patients need to be told if the recommendation has solid medical evidence supporting the advice.
ReplyDelete