Medical Risks and Benefits

Medical Risks and Benefits - Shades of Gray

Readers know how strongly I feel that my profession is suffering from the twin chronic diseases of Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment. Here's a primer on how physicians make medical recommendations to our patients.

Take a look at this grid I prepared, which is worth a full year of medical school.

Low Benefit High Benefit

Low Risk Medical Sweet Spot!

________________________________________

High Risk DANGER ZONE!

When we physicians are contemplating a treatment, or are weighing one treatment against another, we are aiming for the Medical Sweet Spot highlighted in blue above. We want low risk and high reward for our patients. Would we ever consider a treatment within the DANGER ZONE? We would if the patient’s medical circumstance were dire and there were no superior options. For example, if a patient was under a serious threat of a severe outcome, we might consider a treatment with considerable risk that had limited evidence of efficacy. Of course, it may be that an informed patient might decline the treatment.

There are times when the Danger Zone is reasonable.

Obviously, medicine is a murky discipline and most treatments do not fall neatly into one of the 4 quadrants of this grid. Moreover, medical experts often disagree to the extent that a treatment is safe or effective. In other words, different physicians may place the same treatment in different regions of the grid. This is one reason why pursuing a second opinion can become more bewildering than clarifying. Just because a second opinion is different from the original, doesn’t make it right. To further confuse you, two differing medical opinions can both be right!

How does an average patient make sense out of this morass? By asking the right questions.

What are my reasonable treatment options?
What is the scientific evidence supporting each of these options?
What is the scientific evidence of the risks?
Does my personal medical situation favor one option over another? (For example, if a medical option’s risk is to suppress the immune system, and you already have a diminished immune system, then this option may not be suitable for you.)
How will I be monitored for adverse drug reactions?
Is no treatment an option? Where would this choice fall on 'grid'?

In my view, the 'no treatment' option should be considered much more often. Why do so many patients and physicians move this option ‘off the grid’?

Comments

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so. The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals. In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist. Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings. Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape. Private equity (PE) firms have been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight. PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale. While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier. There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform. Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele. It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance. For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings? If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits? The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform. Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat. The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families. Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR). I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary. And it’s not a fair fight. You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine. I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient. You must think I am a magician or a savant. While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago. (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog