Medical Risks and Benefits

Medical Risks and Benefits - Shades of Gray

Readers know how strongly I feel that my profession is suffering from the twin chronic diseases of Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment. Here's a primer on how physicians make medical recommendations to our patients.

Take a look at this grid I prepared, which is worth a full year of medical school.

Low Benefit High Benefit

Low Risk Medical Sweet Spot!

________________________________________

High Risk DANGER ZONE!

When we physicians are contemplating a treatment, or are weighing one treatment against another, we are aiming for the Medical Sweet Spot highlighted in blue above. We want low risk and high reward for our patients. Would we ever consider a treatment within the DANGER ZONE? We would if the patient’s medical circumstance were dire and there were no superior options. For example, if a patient was under a serious threat of a severe outcome, we might consider a treatment with considerable risk that had limited evidence of efficacy. Of course, it may be that an informed patient might decline the treatment.

There are times when the Danger Zone is reasonable.

Obviously, medicine is a murky discipline and most treatments do not fall neatly into one of the 4 quadrants of this grid. Moreover, medical experts often disagree to the extent that a treatment is safe or effective. In other words, different physicians may place the same treatment in different regions of the grid. This is one reason why pursuing a second opinion can become more bewildering than clarifying. Just because a second opinion is different from the original, doesn’t make it right. To further confuse you, two differing medical opinions can both be right!

How does an average patient make sense out of this morass? By asking the right questions.

What are my reasonable treatment options?
What is the scientific evidence supporting each of these options?
What is the scientific evidence of the risks?
Does my personal medical situation favor one option over another? (For example, if a medical option’s risk is to suppress the immune system, and you already have a diminished immune system, then this option may not be suitable for you.)
How will I be monitored for adverse drug reactions?
Is no treatment an option? Where would this choice fall on 'grid'?

In my view, the 'no treatment' option should be considered much more often. Why do so many patients and physicians move this option ‘off the grid’?

Comments

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change. I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday. I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend. And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me. It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career. It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves. As some readers know, my current employed position has been a dream job for me. Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally. My partner and I ran the business. Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades. On an on-call night, if I slept through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery. And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system. A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly. It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients. Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message. Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’. I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility. Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed. The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days. Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'. The patient is advise...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog