Among the many tools that insurance companies wield to save
money is a technique called ‘step therapy’.
This is a technique that exasperates patients and physicians. Here’s how it works.
A patients comes to his doctor with a medical issue. The doctor, who presumably has a decent
measure of medical training, experience and judgment, decides to prescribe a
medication, in an effort to ameliorate the patient’s distress. Let us call this magic elixir Pill A. The doctor zaps this prescription to the
pharmacy at the speed of light using the ever trustworthy electronic medical
record. The satisfied patient leaves
with the mistaken impression that his cure is just around the corner.
Here’s where the fun begins.
Of course, the patient may receive the typical denial as Pill A is not
on the formulary. Keep in mind that an
insurance company’s denial doesn’t mean the patient can’t fill the
prescription. Insurance companies would
never interfere with a physician’s medical judgment. The patient is still free to take the
prescribed drug. The fact that it costs
$2,200 per month is but a trifle. If
Pill A costs a fortune and the insurance company’s alternative Pill B is cheap,
then can we really argue that insurance companies are not practicing medicine?
Physicians in Asylum Driven Mad by Step Therapy
In the above example, usually Pill A and Pill B are
medically equivalent, so the cheaper drug delivers the same benefit. Sometimes, however, the doctor’s preference is
medically superior. Either way, the
process burns up hundreds of hours per year for physicians and our staffs.
Step therapy is when Pill A is denied because the doctor has
not tried different types of medication first, which are not equivalent and are
often inferior. In order to get Pill A
to be covered, the doctor must demonstrate that he has tried other medications
first, and that they were not effective.
So, under this genius system, a patient receives drugs that cost money
and likely won’t work. After enduring this
experiment, the insurance company may ultimately cover the medicine that
should have been prescribed in the first place. Usually such approval is for a limited time guaranteeing that the physician can look forward to a sequel in the near term.
Imagine if a patient suffered a
serious side-effect from one of the step therapy drugs that the doctor knew was
a waste of time.
I’ve argued on this blog on the need to reduce
overutilization and to cut costs. A
fundamental premise of this blog is that less medical care can increase medical
quality. Step therapy managed to both increase costs while it cuts quality, not an easy feat.
We need to step up and step on step therapy.
We need to step up and step on step therapy.
Comments
Post a Comment