Skip to main content

How to Save Health Care Dollars


Health care costs in America are incinerating nearly 20% of the Gross National Product.   Can you say, non-sustainable?   Folks have been bloviating for decades about reforming the health care system with respect to quality, cost and access to care.  This is quite the quagmire.  If it were easily solved, then it would have been done during the Truman administration.


He couldn't get it done.

 
Here are a few reasons why it has been so tough to crack this case.
  • Cutting costs can threaten medical quality.
  • I know of no player in the Medical Industrial Complex who is willing to sacrifice his own revenue to serve the greater good.
  • Pharmaceutical companies receive federal research dollars but are not subject to reasonable governmental control on their opaque pricing schemes.
  • The public expects every conceivable medical benefit, preferably for free.
  • The fee-for-service model drives unnecessary medical care.
  • Pharmacy Benefit Managers – huge middlemen – suck out gazillions of dollars from the system, much of which could be returned to patients to reduce their costs.
  • Medical students typically borrow a few hundred thousand dollars in loans.  This reality drives many of them into high earning medical specialties which ultimately cost the system more money.  We need more primary care physicians, not plastic surgeons.
  • There is an explosion of pricey medical technological health care with duplication of services among competing institutions which may be across the street from each other.   How many MRI machines does one city really need?   And, to justify the costs, each institution must aggressively market for patients.
  • Pharmaceutical ads, much of which is aimed directly to the public who cannot prescribe their own drugs, costs money.  Aren’t you sick of hearing, “Ask you doctor if _____ is right for you!”
  • There is a tsunami of overdiagnosis and overtreatment that is draining the system of zillions of dollars, while also exposing the public to the risks of unnecessary care.
It has always been my personal view that we could markedly increase medical quality and decrease costs simultaneously.   If we could cull the system of unnecessary care, costs would plummet and patients would be liberated from the medical labyrinth that is often the final destination of an unnecessary medical inquiry.  Patients can enter this maze easily, but struggle to find the exit.  Some are trapped inside for years.

So often, an unnecessary (or even necessary) medical test turns up ‘abnormalities’ unrelated to the issue at hand.  Every one of us has internal imperfections that mean nothing.  Once doctors discover them, however,  they then assume an attack mentality to prove that the accidental findings are innocent.   While the doctor may be relaxed during this exercise, the patient is anxious suddenly believing that he could be harboring a serious condition.  Physicians' reassurances may sound hollow to our vexed patients.   “Doctor, I know you said I shouldn’t worry, but then why do I need to repeat a CAT scan in 4 months?”

Why can’t we get to the end zone on controlling medical costs?  To do so would require some businesses and industries to disappear, some occupations to end and many incomes to decrease.  Think of your own profession.   Would you be willing to lose your job or take a 30% pay cut to reform your profession?  I have found that it’s easier to ask someone else to sacrifice for the greater good than to do so yourself.

Comments

  1. "The fee-for-service model drives unnecessary medical care."

    That's the insurance industry-generated talking point, but there's no evidence to prove it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary