Skip to main content

How to Save Health Care Dollars


Health care costs in America are incinerating nearly 20% of the Gross National Product.   Can you say, non-sustainable?   Folks have been bloviating for decades about reforming the health care system with respect to quality, cost and access to care.  This is quite the quagmire.  If it were easily solved, then it would have been done during the Truman administration.


He couldn't get it done.

 
Here are a few reasons why it has been so tough to crack this case.
  • Cutting costs can threaten medical quality.
  • I know of no player in the Medical Industrial Complex who is willing to sacrifice his own revenue to serve the greater good.
  • Pharmaceutical companies receive federal research dollars but are not subject to reasonable governmental control on their opaque pricing schemes.
  • The public expects every conceivable medical benefit, preferably for free.
  • The fee-for-service model drives unnecessary medical care.
  • Pharmacy Benefit Managers – huge middlemen – suck out gazillions of dollars from the system, much of which could be returned to patients to reduce their costs.
  • Medical students typically borrow a few hundred thousand dollars in loans.  This reality drives many of them into high earning medical specialties which ultimately cost the system more money.  We need more primary care physicians, not plastic surgeons.
  • There is an explosion of pricey medical technological health care with duplication of services among competing institutions which may be across the street from each other.   How many MRI machines does one city really need?   And, to justify the costs, each institution must aggressively market for patients.
  • Pharmaceutical ads, much of which is aimed directly to the public who cannot prescribe their own drugs, costs money.  Aren’t you sick of hearing, “Ask you doctor if _____ is right for you!”
  • There is a tsunami of overdiagnosis and overtreatment that is draining the system of zillions of dollars, while also exposing the public to the risks of unnecessary care.
It has always been my personal view that we could markedly increase medical quality and decrease costs simultaneously.   If we could cull the system of unnecessary care, costs would plummet and patients would be liberated from the medical labyrinth that is often the final destination of an unnecessary medical inquiry.  Patients can enter this maze easily, but struggle to find the exit.  Some are trapped inside for years.

So often, an unnecessary (or even necessary) medical test turns up ‘abnormalities’ unrelated to the issue at hand.  Every one of us has internal imperfections that mean nothing.  Once doctors discover them, however,  they then assume an attack mentality to prove that the accidental findings are innocent.   While the doctor may be relaxed during this exercise, the patient is anxious suddenly believing that he could be harboring a serious condition.  Physicians' reassurances may sound hollow to our vexed patients.   “Doctor, I know you said I shouldn’t worry, but then why do I need to repeat a CAT scan in 4 months?”

Why can’t we get to the end zone on controlling medical costs?  To do so would require some businesses and industries to disappear, some occupations to end and many incomes to decrease.  Think of your own profession.   Would you be willing to lose your job or take a 30% pay cut to reform your profession?  I have found that it’s easier to ask someone else to sacrifice for the greater good than to do so yourself.

Comments

  1. "The fee-for-service model drives unnecessary medical care."

    That's the insurance industry-generated talking point, but there's no evidence to prove it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Personal Responsibility for Health

One of the advantages of the computer era is that patients and physicians can communicate via a portal system.  A patient can submit an inquiry which I typically respond to promptly.  It also offers me the opportunity to provide advice or test results to patients.  Moreover, the system documents that the patient has in fact read my message.  Beyond the medical value, it also provides some legal protection if it is later alleged that ‘my doctor never sent me my results’.  I have always endorsed the concept that patients must accept personal responsibility.   Consider this hypothetical example. A patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy and a polyp is removed.   The patient is told to expect a portal message detailing the results in the coming days.   Once the analysis of the polyp has been completed, the doctor sends a message via the portal communicating that the polyp is benign, but is regarded as ‘precancerous'.   The patient is advise...