Jury Blames Talcum Powder for Ovarian Cancer

Jury Blames Talcum Powder for Ovarian Cancer - No Evidence Needed!

I have written about talcum powder previously. Indeed, I have not only opined on the slippery substance, but I am also a regular consumer of the product. Talcum powder has become magic legal dust that brings forth zillions of dollars to those who have been attacked by the poisonous toxin.

Just last year, I informed readers of $55 million and $72 million judgments to cancer victims who used powder against the manufacturer Johnson & Johnson. Earlier this year a Missouri woman was awarded $110 in damages.

Recently, a jury in California, where the cost of everything is stratospheric, ordered J & J to pay damages to a victim of ovarian cancer. The jury clearly wanted to send the company and corporate America a monetary message that went beyond the pinprick judgements that were issued against J & J last year.

Readers at this point are invited to consider what would constitute reasonable damages if it were proven true that the product caused the cancer and the company knew of this risk and did not provide adequate warning to the public. Make your guess before reading on.

Here are some price comparisons to test your sanity

Private Gulfstream Jet $70 million

Penthouse in NYC’s Plaza Hotel $40 million

Alexander Hamilton Autograph $1,000

Bentley Automobile $230,000

100 meter Superyacht $275 million

California Jury Award $417 million

You may resume breathing now. Of course, the plaintiff’s attorneys were able to string a circuitous array of dots that connected talcum powder to cancer in front of a jury who was likely more sympathetic to a dying victim than to a megacorporation. But, sympathy is not evidence and being a successful company does not define negligence.

Few strands of GW's hair is a bargain at $22,800!

This mega-judgment is rendered beyond absurd when one accepts that there is no convincing and consistent scientific conclusion that talcum powder is the responsible agent. The studies have largely demonstrated an association, which are not designed to determine cause and effect.

What should product manufacturers do? Should every package include a boxed warning that the product can cause misery and death just to cover themselves? Perhaps, not. This would only give customers anxiety, pain and suffering. Guess what would happen next?

Comments

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

Will Artificial Intelligence Become My Doctor?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is riding over the countryside and the globe on a tidal wave. It will gather strength and will become a tsunami sooner than we think. Like any tool, its use depends upon the intent of the user. A hammer can be used to build but can also be used to break. It can serve as a weapon. The tool bears no culpability. We have no reliable way to prevent tools from being used for nefarious activities. I don’t think the solution is to eliminate hammers from society to reduce hammer violence. The overall idealized strategy is to stifle dark intent lurking within people so that they might not consider taking evil actions. Sadly, we have all seen that this worthy task is far out of reach. We simply don’t have a tool to accomplish this. A tool with many uses. AI will be a tool like no other. It will deliver preternatural benefits in every sphere of society. I predict that it will make the internet seem quaint by ...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog