I had an interesting conversation with a patient in the
office some time ago. He was sent to me to evaluate
abnormal liver blood tests, a common issue for gastroenterologists to unravel. I did not think that these laboratory
abnormalities portended an unfavorable medical outcome. Beyond the medical issue he confided to me a harrowing personal
tribulation. Often, I find that a
person’s personal story is more interesting and significant than the medical issue that led him
to see me.
I am taking care to de-identify him here, and I did secure
his permission to chronicle this vignette.
He is active duty military and is suffering from attention deficit
disorder (ADD). He likes his job. He was treated with several medications,
which were either not effective or well tolerated. Finally, he was prescribed Vyvanse, which
was a wonder drug for him. The ADD symptoms
melted away. This is when military
madness kicked in. He met with military
medical officials who concurred that this medicine was appropriate for
him. This decision, however, was
overruled by a superior, since Vyvanse, is a controlled drug, which was prohibited. My patient was told that he could choose between taking this drug or keeping his job. In other words, if he opted for
the one drug that worked for him, that he would have to quit. Who wins here?
Scales Tipped Against Him
While I do not know all of the relevant facts , this seemed
absurd to me. My guess is that the
decision came right out of a Policy & Procedure Manual, which so often
contains one-size-fits-all directives that override any measure of common
sense. It is this mentality that expels
a first grader who kisses a classmate because the school has a rigid
zero-tolerance policy against sexual harassment.
When the patient was in my office, he had been off Vyvanse
as required by his military superiors. He was not
feeling mentally well. Not only was he
off of his medication, but he was facing a profound professional decision that would
change his life.
And here’s the most ludicrous aspect of the situation. The patient told me that other branches of
the military had no issue with their servicemen taking VyVanse. These branches apparently use different Policy
& Procedure Manuals.
If this vignette is representative of the how decisions are
made in his military branch, then they have a deeper issue to address. Is there a medication that can combat rigid
and robotic thinking? If so, let’s hope
it’s not a controlled substance.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete