Whistleblower Wishes Readers Merry Christmas!

A close acquaintance of mine voiced objection to the lighting of the National Christmas tree, which occurred on the first day of this month. Red, white and blue LED lights were illuminated. I find no offense in this practice, which for me is a secularized event, even though I acknowledge its connection to the Christmas season. Kids who visited Santa, as I did decades ago, do so in the days and weeks before Christmas. Neither Santa nor his elves visit us during Arbor Day, the Fourth of July or Veterans Day. He is connected with Christmas, although like the tree, his purpose is far removed from the true religious meaning of December 25^th.

A Christmas tree is not quite the nativity scene. Readers who have more knowledge of the New Testament than I can inform us if a Christmas tree with a star on top and wrapped gifts underneath is mentioned in the Gospels. Perhaps, Santa truly is a religious figure, since like the three wise men, he comes bearing gifts.

Religious icon?

Santa and saint are separated by only 1 letter. Hmm...

I am sure that many children have contemplated the mystery of how Santa was able to appear in so many department stores simultaneously. Any thoughts here? I assumed that his reindeer simply transported him at supersonic speed, although, perhaps, there is another explanation.

Similarly, I do not fine our national motto ‘in God we trust’ offensive or a violation of the separation of church and state. It has taken on, in my view, a secular meaning.

Fear of offense has led many individuals and organization to sanitize their Christmas greetings using phrases that contain all the mirth and meaning of a recorded phone menu message from airline companies. Doesn’t Seasons Greetings really nail it? How about Happy Holidays?

At 4 p.m. today the National Menorah will be kindled on the White House grounds. The menorah, arguably more of a religious symbol than a tree, is generally not the object of public protest. Both the menorah and the tree are illuminated. Who would object to bringing a little more light into the world?

Comments

Why This Doctor Gave Up Telemedicine

During the pandemic, I engaged in telemedicine with my patients out of necessity. This platform was already destined to become part of the medical landscape even prior to the pandemic. COVID-19 accelerated the process. The appeal is obvious. Patients can have medical visits from their own homes without driving to the office, parking, checking in, finding their way to the office, biding time in the waiting room and then driving out afterwards. And patients could consult physicians from far distances, even across state lines. Most of the time invested in traditional office visits occurs before and after the actual visits. So much time wasted! Indeed, telemedicine has answered the prayers of time management enthusiasts. At first, I was also intoxicated treating patients via cyberspace, or telemedically, if I may invent a term. I could comfortably sink into my own couch in sweatpants as I guided patients through the heartbreak of hemorrhoids and the distress of diarrhea. Clear

Am I Spreading Covid-19 Misinformation?

I presume that most of us are hostile to hate speech, misinformation and disinformation. Politicians and others want social media to be scrubbed of all nefarious postings. Twitter is most recently in the crosshairs on this issue after Elon Musk assumed ownership of the company. They still haven’t settled on a moderation policy. Social media and other information sources have been accused of radicalizing Americans, fostering hate, undermining our elections, providing a forum for bullies and predators, promoting division and coarsening our national discourse. One man’s cleansing of disinformation is another man’s censorship. There is some speech that all reasonable people would agree should be banned, such as incitement to violence or prurient matter that children can access. I challenge those who advocate against publishing hate speech, misinformation or disinformation to offer precise definitions of these categories. Trust me, this is no easy endeavor. And if you are

Whistleblower Grand Rounds Vol. 6 No. 22: It’s ‘Alimentary’, Doctors!

It’s been a while since I’ve attended a conventional medical Grand Rounds. These were events where a medical luminary would fly in to give a medical audience a state-of-the-art presentation on a medical subject. Ideally, the speaker was a thought leader and a researcher on the issue. These presentations were usually not a demonstration of the virtue of humility. We physicians, as a class, have generous egos. Academic physicians occupy a higher rung on the ego ladder. Medical Grand Rounders (MGRs), who are on the GR speaking circuit, often must bring their own ladders to assure they will be able to reach their desired atmospheric height. Jacob’s Ladder Photo Credit At least in the old days, before the GR speaker would assume his position behind the rostrum, a designated pre-speaker would offer an introduction. The audience would hear a list of awards, achievements, journal editorial positions, department chairmanships, honorary degrees, publications and book chapter authorships,

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog