Skip to main content

The Importance of Medical Judgement - Part II

Last week, I offered up an argument on why medical judgement means more than medical knowledge.  In other words, being a really, really smart doctor is not the essential qualification for practicing excellent medicine.  I ended last week’s post with some examples of medical ads that are familiar to all of us. 

Here are some ads and slogans that you won’t see on highway billboards or in press advertisements.

·       Bring your back pain to our orthopedists.  They probably won’t operate on you since most back pain is not effectively treated surgically.  You don’t want unnecessary surgery, do you?

·       Wanna lose weight?  Consult with our bariatric surgeons who will refer you to one of our certified dieticians so you can endure yet another diet.  Who wants a trigger happy surgeon anyway?

·       Come to our oncology center for a second opinion.  Don’t expect any new treatments, since ‘promising’ experimental treatments are exactly that – experiments.  We’re not rolling the dice with your life. 

The public equates technology and active medical intervention with excellent medical quality.  That’s why ad copy from doctors and hospitals often uses phrases such as, cutting edge, robotic, laser, state-of-the-art, etc.  Most patients would not react as positively to an ad championing conservative doctors who don’t order too many tests or write many prescriptions, even if these practitioners are better physicians.

Why Medical Judgement is Like Steak.  Read on.

We tend to respect medical professional who do stuff more than we do those who don’t do stuff or just slug it out preventing disease.   Which doctor will command more respect in the community, a cardiac surgeon who is renowned for his expert craftsmanship on performing bypass surgeries, or a family physician who succeeds in getting patients to quit cigarettes so they never need bypass operations?

Sure, I know how to do a colonoscopy, after having done 30,000 of them.  Any technician can be taught how to do this procedure skillfully.  But is this enough? Patients deserve sound medical judgment, not just technical prowess.  When you see your gastroenterologist in the office, and colonoscopy enters the conversation, judgement needs to be in the room also.

·       Is colonoscopy truly necessary?
·       Is there a better or safer test that should be done instead?
·       Are the risks of colonoscopy too high considering my personal medical circumstances?
·       Has my doctor explained how the colonoscopy results will affect my care? 

This last item is absolutely critical.  If your doctor orders a test, make sure that you are persuaded that the test result will shape or change your medical advice.  For example, if your doctor is going to recommend exercise and medications for your new onset of back pain as initial treatment, then an MRI of the back doesn’t make sense.

I hope that I have given you enough knowledge to make good judgments.

Medical knowledge has the sizzle.  But, medical judgement is the steak.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of...

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) Durin...