Every four years, abortion gets more press and attention as
the candidates compete for electoral support.
My own position on this issue is not relevant for the points I offer
here. We all know that candidates
massage their position on abortion and on other issues in an attempt to
maximize their voter support. It’s fun to
watch them thread the needle as they dance and pirouette for us. They are performers who can be as flexible as
the amazing acrobats on Cirque du Soleil.
The emphasis, if not the content of their message, changes depending
upon the audience. Al Gore was ridiculed
when he sported a more southern accent when he was campaigning below the
Mason-Dixon line.
Donald Trump was clearly unprepared for the abortion
question when he rhetorically collapsed during a typically vigorous and
frenetic interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews.
Of course, you don’t really have to prepare on an issue if you already
have a principled position. You can just
tell the truth.
Trump's Interview - Not Star Quality
Donald Trump initially responded that women who are seeking
an illegal abortion should be legally accountable. This was the bombshell. While Trump walked this back in record time,
I do not understand why his initial position was wrong. And yet, even the most conservative
politicians, such as Cruz and Huckabee, do not advocate targeting women in
these cases.
Why not?
If abortion is against the law, then why isn’t a woman who
seeks the procedure violating the law? I
suspect the reason that there is no support for this – and I’m not saying that
I support it – is that such a view would be the equivalent of swallowing
political cyanide. I ask readers here to
calmly explain from a legal perspective why the doctor and the abortion
facility would be legally vulnerable, and not the woman. Yes, I know the argument that woman is
already a victim, etc., but this is not how we approach other legal violations.
If gambling is illegal, and the police raid an illegal
casino, do we expect the gamblers would be set free? If an illegal prostitution ring is
discovered, are the clients not prosecuted?
Of course they are.
To me this issue sounds like a duel between Principle and
Pandering. We know how these contests
usually end.
The answer, my friend, is not to pursue equating the victim's "crime" with those of the alleged perpetrators but rather to do the right thing and legalize abortion everywhere so that NO ONE'S actions can be labelled a crime, legally or otherwise.
ReplyDeleteSo prostitution, gambling, and those other things he mentioned should be legal as well? Give me an intellectual challenge and tell me a reason that does not involve 'abortion should be legal so that people don't do it illegally,' which seems backward reasoning to me. Yet it's all I hear about 'good things for abortion.' How abortion is winning when their argument is as I said, and their opponents are called 'pro-life' seems confusing to me.
ReplyDeleteHave some respect for pro-abortion and their opponent's intellectual level and give a well-thought-out and reasonable response, without the faulty thinking.