Skip to main content

Are GMO Foods Safe?

The nutrition police are at it again.  They demand that food products that use genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their processing inform us of this on the product’s label.  They argue, not only that consumers have a right to know how their food is prepared, but also that manufacturers should be required to disclose when evil GMOs are utilized.  (Keep in mind that most of the food that we consume includes GMOs, a fact likely unknown by most of us.)

Proposed Label For GMO Foods

This labeling demand from the nutritionistas is a little hard for me to swallow. 

I don’t want to hear about polling that demonstrates that most American favor mandatory labeling.  I guess we cite poll results when they support our views and dismiss them when we don’t.  Donald Trump is ahead in every poll.  See my point?

There is no scientific evidence that GMOs harm our health.  Fear is not evidence.  Political correctness is not evidence.  Indeed, the Food and Drug Administration requires no GMO labeling as it has concluded that these foods are safe.  

What’s at stake here?  Just a small trifle called freedom of speech.  I don’t think a person or a business should be forced to ‘speak’ just because a vocal constituency demands it, in the absence of any pressing public need for this.  Obviously, I support labeling that highlights specific known dangers of a product.  If a food item, for example, contains peanuts, then this should appear on the label to protect individuals who have a peanut allergy. 

Why should we stop with just GMO labeling?  Why not force food companies to include on their labels what cleaning supplies the companies use so the public can be reassured that they are environmentally friendly?   Should a coffee shop be mandated to label their coffee as made with tap water because the filtered-water crowd believes this to be toxic?  Should vegetables be required to have labels that specify that this product is not organic?

If a consumer wants to know if their Pop Tarts are tainted with GMOs, then he should feel free to call the 1-800 number on the label to inquire. 

What if everyone could be forced to label ourselves according to the whims of others?  How ‘bout if the nutrition police had to wear the following label:

CAUTION!
I MIGHT BE CONTAGIOUS!

I think this is totally reasonable and reasonable.  Maybe this individual is harboring a serious communicable disease and is simply unaware that he is infected.  Just because there isn’t a shred of medical evidence behind this, doesn’t mean we can’t mandate a public warning.  Absurd?  Of course.  

There's right to free speech.  There's also a right to remain silent.  You have no right to make me say what you want to hear.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...