Skip to main content

Are GMO Foods Safe?

The nutrition police are at it again.  They demand that food products that use genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their processing inform us of this on the product’s label.  They argue, not only that consumers have a right to know how their food is prepared, but also that manufacturers should be required to disclose when evil GMOs are utilized.  (Keep in mind that most of the food that we consume includes GMOs, a fact likely unknown by most of us.)

Proposed Label For GMO Foods

This labeling demand from the nutritionistas is a little hard for me to swallow. 

I don’t want to hear about polling that demonstrates that most American favor mandatory labeling.  I guess we cite poll results when they support our views and dismiss them when we don’t.  Donald Trump is ahead in every poll.  See my point?

There is no scientific evidence that GMOs harm our health.  Fear is not evidence.  Political correctness is not evidence.  Indeed, the Food and Drug Administration requires no GMO labeling as it has concluded that these foods are safe.  

What’s at stake here?  Just a small trifle called freedom of speech.  I don’t think a person or a business should be forced to ‘speak’ just because a vocal constituency demands it, in the absence of any pressing public need for this.  Obviously, I support labeling that highlights specific known dangers of a product.  If a food item, for example, contains peanuts, then this should appear on the label to protect individuals who have a peanut allergy. 

Why should we stop with just GMO labeling?  Why not force food companies to include on their labels what cleaning supplies the companies use so the public can be reassured that they are environmentally friendly?   Should a coffee shop be mandated to label their coffee as made with tap water because the filtered-water crowd believes this to be toxic?  Should vegetables be required to have labels that specify that this product is not organic?

If a consumer wants to know if their Pop Tarts are tainted with GMOs, then he should feel free to call the 1-800 number on the label to inquire. 

What if everyone could be forced to label ourselves according to the whims of others?  How ‘bout if the nutrition police had to wear the following label:

CAUTION!
I MIGHT BE CONTAGIOUS!

I think this is totally reasonable and reasonable.  Maybe this individual is harboring a serious communicable disease and is simply unaware that he is infected.  Just because there isn’t a shred of medical evidence behind this, doesn’t mean we can’t mandate a public warning.  Absurd?  Of course.  

There's right to free speech.  There's also a right to remain silent.  You have no right to make me say what you want to hear.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and studying, two longstanding personal pleasures, could be ext

The VIP Syndrome Threatens Doctors' Health

Over the years, I have treated various medical professionals from physicians to nurses to veterinarians to optometrists and to occasional medical residents in training. Are these folks different from other patients?  Are there specific challenges treating folks who have a deep knowledge of the medical profession?   Are their unique risks to be wary of when the patient is a medical professional? First, it’s still a running joke in the profession that if a medical student develops an ordinary symptom, then he worries that he has a horrible disease.  This is because the student’s experience in the hospital and the required reading are predominantly devoted to serious illnesses.  So, if the student develops some constipation, for example, he may fear that he has a bowel blockage, similar to one of his patients on the ward.. More experienced medical professionals may also bring above average anxiety to the office visit.  Physicians, after all, are members of the human species.  A pulmon

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today