Whistleblower Looks Ahead to 2016

At the end of every year, the airwaves compete for our attention on programming that ‘looks back’ at the past year.

People we’ve lost in 2015.

The 10 biggest news stories of 2015.

The greatest gaffes of the past year.

Stories that made us cry in 2015.

Year-end magazine issues follow the same playbook.

Whistleblower doesn’t look back.

Whistleblower Eschews Rear-view Mirror

I suppose there is a public appetite for retrospectovision since, as we all know, the media’s mission is to serve up what we demand. The newspaper adage, ‘if it bleeds, it leads’, is more a comment on us than it is on the journalism profession. We are vampires who look to media for our next blood meal.

Looking ahead is tougher since it’s quite a bit easier to chronicle known facts than it is to predict and guess. But, isn’t this a more worthy task? How do these story proposals grab you?

People we’ll lose in 2016. (Not serious, just want to assure you’re paying attention.)

Why CNN will abandon the omnipresent banner –BREAKING NEWS – in 2016.

Hillary Clinton pledges no e-mailing in 2016. Will rely upon carrier pigeons for all classified communications.

Obama announces bold new ISIS 2016 strategy. Will no longer ‘contain’, but will now ‘restrain’ the jihadist group.

U.S. Airlines announce new 2016 policy to serve customers better. While the commodious seats have already been narrowed with the pitch reduced (this means just try to lean your chair back), economy seats will now be upholstered with carpet tacks with the pointy ends facing upwards poised to pierce travelers’ posteriors. Leaving aside questions of hygiene, by industrial engineers have designed these barbs so they will not cause significant blood loss, unless there is air turbulence, which would be God's fault. Why are they doing this? This comports to their philosophy of only charging customers for what they want. For example, if a traveler does not want enough legroom to accommodate the average sized legs of a 6-year-old child, then why should he pay for it? Similarly, focus group testing has demonstrated that some passengers enjoy the carpet tack experience. For them, there will be no surcharge. Why should these thick skinned travelers have to pay for an upgrade that they do not want? Any traveler who wishes to pay for a smooth seat, is free to do so. In line with their reasonable pricing policies, the upgrade costs $35 if requested when your ticket is booked, $75 at the gate and $150 when you reach your seat.

Safe travels to all. Wishing you all the best in the coming year.

Comments

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog