Skip to main content

Free WiFi in the Doctor's Office?

I am always always been irked when a hotel charges me for Wi-Fi use. This pick-pocketing is resented by hotel guests across the fruited plain.   This money grab is taken right out of the airlines’ playbook, who now charge us for carry-on bags, an aisle seat, a candy bar, a working flotation device ‘in the unlikely event of a water landing’ or a functioning oxygen mask.   Need to change your reservation?  Easily done for $150.  On what basis can this fee be deemed reasonable?  It constitutes consumer abuse of the first order.  Although airline profits are soaring, and fuel costs have tanked, there has been no trickle-down effect to travelers, who are left with little recourse except to pen cranky blog posts. 

Airlines Heading Back to No Frills

Hotels know that Wi-Fi is like oxygen.  Since we can’t live without it, why not extort a few dollars for it.  A paradox in this exploitative practice is that cheap hotels give their guests free Wi-Fi, while top tier hotels might charge $15 a day for the privilege of using a service that costs the hotel nothing.  There will usually be some inconvenient location where it is free for all, knowing that most of us want the service in our hotel rooms.

“We have a free Wi-Fi area on the other side of the parking lot.  Since it’s raining, we do have umbrellas available, for a small fee…”

Guests are pushing back.  Hotels are taking notice and backing off.  We have an expectation that some goods and services should be free according to natural law.

Here are some items that I never want to pay for.
  • Water at restaurant
  • Bread at a restaurant
  • WiFi
  • Customer service from a living, breathing human being regarding a product I have purchased.
  • An extended warrantee.
  • Plastic or paper bags at a supermarket.
  • Parking lot fee at a theater. 
  • Shipping and handling fees. 
The medical profession is always on the lookout for revenue enhancement.  Perhaps, we should also adopt an a la carte fee approach.  Here are some items we might start charging for in our gastroenterology practice.
  • Pre-visit handwash.
  • Restroom use.
  • Toilet paper in the restroom.
  • Working light in the restroom.
  • Clean colonoscopy equipment.
  • Waiting room magazines less than 6 months old.
  • Waiting room chair use.  This would be coin operated.   Once the 15 minutes expires, the patient would have 2 minutes to insert additional coins in order to avoid a very gentle series of electric shocks.
Why should we physicians leave money on the table?  If you want to change your appointment, we can do this for a mere $150. 

Perhaps, our practice should establish a Rewards Program, where patients can accrue points after each office visit.  100 points might give you a preferred parking place.  250 points might guarantee you an on time appointment.  500 points might entitle you to extra anesthesia during your procedure.  And, 750 points might grant you a half hour access to our Wi-Fi. 


  1. I agree- free WiFi is important to the consumer. I see medical practices, particularly GI practices where the waiting time for procedures eat up lots of time. Value added services- TV, WiFi, free coffee/water. I also recently added cell phone charging stations. Customers ( patients and families ) are looking for value added services for their health care dollars.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Why This Doctor Gave Up Telemedicine

During the pandemic, I engaged in telemedicine with my patients out of necessity.  This platform was already destined to become part of the medical landscape even prior to the pandemic.  COVID-19 accelerated the process.  The appeal is obvious.  Patients can have medical visits from their own homes without driving to the office, parking, checking in, finding their way to the office, biding time in the waiting room and then driving out afterwards.  And patients could consult physicians from far distances, even across state lines.  Most of the time invested in traditional office visits occurs before and after the actual visits.  So much time wasted! Indeed, telemedicine has answered the prayers of time management enthusiasts. At first, I was also intoxicated treating patients via cyberspace, or telemedically, if I may invent a term.   I could comfortably sink into my own couch in sweatpants as I guided patients through the heartbreak of hemorrhoids and the distress of diarrhea.   Clear

Solutions for Medical Burnout

Over the past few months, I’ve written enough posts on Medical Burnout that I have created a new category to house them.  Readers will find there posts detailing the causes and consequences of burnout in the medical profession. The profession has been long on the causes but short on solutions.   What must be done to loosen the burnout shackles from medical professionals? It will be a huge undertaking for caregivers and society at large to turn this ocean liner around.  And it will take time.  The first step must be to obtain a commitment to the overall mission from as many constituents as possible.   Support will be needed from medical professionals, hospital leadership and administrators, physician employers, insurance companies and the public.   As with many reform efforts, many of the players must be willing to sacrifice some of their own interests in order to server the greater good – a worthy and rare event.   Without adequate buy-in from stakeholders, the effort will never ge