Skip to main content

Does is Matter if Your Doctor is Liberal or Conservative?

In the medical world, when a physician, a scientist, a hospital, a drug company or a panel of experts issues a report, the games begin.  If one agrees with the statement or benefits from it, then the report is heralded as breakthrough brilliance.  If, however, the report suggests a new medical pathway that diminishes your relevance or reimbursement, then the report and its authors are regarded as misguided.  Yes, I am generalizing somewhat here, but you get the point.

As readers of this blog know, I am a conservative medical practitioner.  I do not mean conservative as in supporting the NRA, prayer in public schools, self-deportation of illegal aliens (or should I say ‘undocumented residents?), ‘clean coal’ and lower taxes for millionaires and billionaires.  Conservative physicians describe those who are extremely judicious with regard to medical treatment and diagnostic testing.  We don’t lurch to treat or test unless a high threshold of necessity and effectiveness is crossed.  Before ordering a medical test, two questions should be considered.

Will the results of the test under consideration potentially change the medical management of the patient?

Is the change in medical management referenced above in the patient’s best interests?


Let me illustrate why the 2nd question above is so critical.   For example, assume a surgeon orders an ultrasound on a patient with abdominal pain to determine if gallstones are present.   This test seems reasonable as the result of the test may change the medical management of the patient – the point raised in question 1.  So far, so good.  If gallstones are present, then the surgeon removes the gallbladder.  But, if this is not the correct treatment (because the pain is not caused by gallstones), then the principle in question 2 has been violated. In this example, the physician feels that the ultrasound  test was needed as it led to gallbladder removal.   He feels that the test changed the management of the patient – which it did – but it led him down the wrong path. So, the test was not reasonable and should not have been ordered in the first place.

I make this point as for years during medical training and afterwards, I have been told and have read that tests should only be done if they might change medical advice.  This is true but not the whole story.  Left out of this medical maxim is the more important point that the new medical advice must advance the patient’s medical interest.

An oncologist may recommend a CAT scan because if new cancer is found, then new treatment will be prescribed.  Does this strategy pass the two question test I have raised here?  Sometimes yes, and sometimes no.

Is there anyone out there who doesn’t believe that we are testing and treating patients excessively? 

This same two-question strategy can be applied to a medical commentary blog to assess its worth. 

Does the blog potentially change your point of view?
Is this new viewpoint enriching you?

As always, readers’ views are earnestly solicited.  


  1. As an R. N. and a patient, I don't stay with a "liberal" physician who orders tests willy-nilly. There can such a thing as too conservative, however, when a test result, in light of my age, showed clearly that I had a parathyroid adenoma, but instead I was praised for having such a nice, high calcium level! I had it for over 5 years before my newer physician picked it up. He is wisely conservative, but also willing to look at symptoms outside of his field of cardiology when said symptoms aren't in alignment with his specialty. I also happen to feel much more comfortable with a politically conservative physician, as I feel that I can trust him far more than one who is stuck on Obamacare, which is a disaster.

  2. Barbara, if I had a category on this blog entitled, Comments Quality, yours would be entered. Well stated. Visit often.

  3. I've had several doctors that are too conservative also and they've hurt me worse than the liberal ones.

    Its the liberal ones who did cover all the bases that helped me to find an answer.

    Now to just get the docs to treat the problem.


  4. Aw, thanks, doc! You made my day! :-) I follow your blog on Bloglovin' and quote you freely!

  5. Dr Kirsch, in your opinion as a gastroenterologist, are surgeons too ready to perform lap chole for biliary dyskinesia (i.e. low gallbladder EF on HIDA scan)? Do you believe that a more "conservative" approach to biliary dyskinesia is warranted, or that too many lap choles are being done for this indication?

  6. While I do not offer any specific medical advice on this blog, in general, biliary dyskinesia is a tricky issue that is not easily defined. There is no single and satisfying answer on how to approach it. Biliary endoscopists are generally the most knowledgeable on this issue and should be part of the conversation.

  7. Dr Kirsch, I actually asked my question regarding biliary dyskinesia because I am a general surgeon and am frustrated by the ubiquitous "abdominal pain/GI distress + low gallbladder EF" consult. Even after reviewing the literature, I am often unclear how to proceed. The patients all seem to want their gallbladders out ASAP because someone convinced them that they would feel so much better so soon -- I end up being the bad guy that tries to slow down the wagon train.

  8. @anonymous general surgeon, your dilemma is not quite a quagmire. If the cholecystectomy does not make sense, help the patient understand the folly of going through an unnecessary procedure. "Would you want to undergo surgery, with it's risks, if there is only a 5% or less chance that it will help"? I'm sure that you are aware that there is often a placebo effect after gallbladder (GB) removal when the GB was not responsible for the pain. If patients or their MD's insist on donating a perfectly health GB, then you might gently advise a 2nd opinion with an 'expert' at your local medical mecca. I assure you that you will not be a hero if the patient continues to have pain after an operation where there were hopes for a cure. Moreover, if there is a surgical complication, then would you be comfortable that the surgical indications were solid?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Why This Doctor Gave Up Telemedicine

During the pandemic, I engaged in telemedicine with my patients out of necessity.  This platform was already destined to become part of the medical landscape even prior to the pandemic.  COVID-19 accelerated the process.  The appeal is obvious.  Patients can have medical visits from their own homes without driving to the office, parking, checking in, finding their way to the office, biding time in the waiting room and then driving out afterwards.  And patients could consult physicians from far distances, even across state lines.  Most of the time invested in traditional office visits occurs before and after the actual visits.  So much time wasted! Indeed, telemedicine has answered the prayers of time management enthusiasts. At first, I was also intoxicated treating patients via cyberspace, or telemedically, if I may invent a term.   I could comfortably sink into my own couch in sweatpants as I guided patients through the heartbreak of hemorrhoids and the distress of diarrhea.   Clear

Do Doctors Talk to Each Other?

 I will share with readers a recent occurrence between me and another doctor that was both rare and refreshing.  I was serving as the gastrointestinal consultant on one of the doctor’s patients.  I performed a scope examination of the stomach and obtained some routine biopsy specimens.  The pathology results were abnormal, but benign.  No urgent action was needed, but a full airing of the significance of the results would require a conversation between me and the patient in an office visit.  I notified the patient that there was no medical threat at all and we would unpack it all during his next visit. The referring physician wondered about this delay, which perhaps is a different style from other gastroenterologists (GI’s) who he works with.   (My guess is that other GI’s may opt to handle the issue with the patient on the phone or via the portal. I think, however, that there’s too much complexity to fully address this issue in this manner.) So, here’s what the referring doctor did.