Many times over the years, I have witnessed the following
scenario in my exam room. Here’s the set
up of this one act play.
I’m seated at my desktop computer. The patient is seated before me. The patient’s daughter is seated next to her mother.
I’m seated at my desktop computer. The patient is seated before me. The patient’s daughter is seated next to her mother.
Characters
Elderly patient
Attentive daughter
The doctor
Curtain's Up
Scene I
A patient comes to see me in the office with medical issues
that strongly suggest that a colonoscopy should be performed. As an aside, it is not my practice style to
issue a colonoscopy edict, but rather to present the patient with available
options, which should always include no testing as an alternative. I may at that point strongly urge that the
patient accept my colonoscopy recommendation, but at least the patient then
knows the options with their respective advantages and drawbacks.
[Reader aside: Examples of medical issues that lead most
gastroenterologists and physicians to advise colonoscopy include:
- Rectal bleeding
- Change in bowel habits
- Anemia, or low blood count, with a suspected intestinal bleeding site
Several times over the course of my near quarter century career, an
intelligent patient who has a good reason to have a colonoscopy declines to proceed with one and opts for
nothing.]
Scene II
The patient declines any form of colonic intrusion. The
attentive daughter becomes apoplectic over mom's decision.
“Mom, you have to get this done. I did it and it was a breeze. Even Uncle Harry did it and he’s older than
you.”
Of course, the patient’s view dictates the outcome, as it
should. The patient in these cases is
elderly and uses an entirely different playbook from the child, who would
readily consent to the procedure herself. The child is entirely well meaning and
frightened that her parent might harbor a serious condition, which is entirely
possible. The patient views this issue,
and life in general, through a different lens.
Decisions are weighed using a different set of weights and measures. The parent may have lived a long an full
life and has personal priorities that differ from those of younger loved ones. When I witness these occasional conflicts in
the office, the child is clearly vexed while the patient is at peace.
Most of the time, a parent and child are in agreement with
the chosen course of action. But, not
always. These situations taught me an
important lesson that I never learned in medical school. Patients are unique individuals whose view
of the world, accumulated life experiences and station in life may lead to unpredictable decisions. These plays often have surprise endings.
Holy crap! And yes, I chose purposefully.
ReplyDeleteI'd suspect bashfulness over the hippie-ish "at peace". Older women tend to forgo gynecological visits too
@Third News, what, no thesaurus this time in preparing your comments?
ReplyDeleteOh was that a little coup de plume? What if I told you I left a steganographic game in my comment, and ya totally missed it...I didn't.
ReplyDeleteBTW, whatever happen to the art of charientism?
I have having my IT folks combing through your messages, meta data, etc. You know how I earn my living. What's your gig?
ReplyDeleteTwice you have asked, and somehow I don't think it is a case of trivial epistemophilia.
ReplyDeleteIt must be interesting to have vast armamentarium but little instinct
Ok, stay hidden behind the curtain. Very pleased with your presence here.
ReplyDelete