Skip to main content

When Should a Patient Reject Colonoscopy?

Many times over the years, I have witnessed the following scenario in my exam room.  Here’s the set up of this one act play.

I’m seated at my desktop computer.  The patient is seated before me.  The patient’s daughter is seated next to her mother.

Elderly patient
Attentive daughter
The doctor

Curtain's Up

Scene I

A patient comes to see me in the office with medical issues that strongly suggest that a colonoscopy should be performed.  As an aside, it is not my practice style to issue a colonoscopy edict, but rather to present the patient with available options, which should always include no testing as an alternative.  I may at that point strongly urge that the patient accept my colonoscopy recommendation, but at least the patient then knows the options with their respective advantages and drawbacks.

[Reader aside: Examples of medical issues that lead most gastroenterologists and physicians to advise colonoscopy include:
  • Rectal bleeding
  • Change in bowel habits
  • Anemia, or low blood count, with a suspected intestinal bleeding site
Several times over the course of my near quarter century career, an intelligent patient who has a good reason to have a colonoscopy declines to proceed with one and opts for nothing.]

Scene II

The patient declines any form of colonic intrusion.  The attentive daughter becomes apoplectic over mom's decision.  

“Mom, you have to get this done.   I did it and it was a breeze.  Even Uncle Harry did it and he’s older than you.”

Of course, the patient’s view dictates the outcome, as it should.  The patient in these cases is elderly and uses an entirely different playbook from the child, who would readily consent to the procedure herself.  The child is entirely well meaning and frightened that her parent might harbor a serious condition, which is entirely possible.  The patient views this issue, and life in general, through a different lens.  Decisions are weighed using a different set of weights and measures.  The parent may have lived a long an full life and has personal priorities that differ from those of younger loved ones.  When I witness these occasional conflicts in the office, the child is clearly vexed while the patient is at peace.

Most of the time, a parent and child are in agreement with the chosen course of action.  But, not always.  These situations taught me an important lesson that I never learned in medical school.   Patients are unique individuals whose view of the world, accumulated life experiences and station in life may lead to unpredictable decisions.   These plays often have surprise endings.  


  1. Holy crap! And yes, I chose purposefully.

    I'd suspect bashfulness over the hippie-ish "at peace". Older women tend to forgo gynecological visits too

  2. @Third News, what, no thesaurus this time in preparing your comments?

  3. Oh was that a little coup de plume? What if I told you I left a steganographic game in my comment, and ya totally missed it...I didn't.

    BTW, whatever happen to the art of charientism?

  4. I have having my IT folks combing through your messages, meta data, etc. You know how I earn my living. What's your gig?

  5. Twice you have asked, and somehow I don't think it is a case of trivial epistemophilia.

    It must be interesting to have vast armamentarium but little instinct

  6. Ok, stay hidden behind the curtain. Very pleased with your presence here.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary