Skip to main content

Measuring Medical Quality: Move Over Pay-for-Performance


                                                                                      
Obamacare has promised to provide all of us with quality medical care that is affordable and accessible.  The very name of the law is the Affordable Care Act, which I have maintained will be short on both affordability and quality care.  Most of the country agrees with me.  The postponement for a year of the  corporate mandate to provide insurance in businesses with at least 50 full time employees was a great relief to these businesses and to Democrats across the country who were shivering from fear that voters would hold them accountable in 2014 when the country witnessed the debacle.  Was this solely a policy decision independent of politics?  I won’t insult readers’ intelligence by weighing in here.

Mandate Postponed from Electoral Anxiety?

How will the Obama and insurance company vanguards of bureaucrats ensure quality?  They will measure of bunch of silly stuff that is easy to measure but counts for almost nothing.  What really counts can’t be easily counted.  But, these guys will count what is easy to count and pretend that it matters.

Let’s have readers try their hand at measuring medical quality.  Depending upon your responses, you might gain a position with the Department of Health and Human Services.

Which of the following is the best measurement of quality of an obstetrician?
           (1)    The percentage of Pap smears done on his patient population
           (2)    The percentage of mammograms done on his patient population
           (3)    Judgment of when a Caesarean section is appropriate
           (4)    Patient satisfaction score

Which of the following is the best measurement of quality of a ccardiologist?
(1)    The doctor puts heart into his work
(2)    The doctor and his staff have a good rhythm
(3)    The doctor has a good beat
(4)    The doctor knows when chest pain is serious

Which of the following is the best measurement of quality of a pediatrician?
(1)    All appropriate vaccines are administered
(2)    The physician rates very highly on surveys grading compassion and caring
(3)    The practice uses a nurse practitioner available for same day appointments
(4)    The pediatrician knows when a sick child should be hospitalized. 

How can the government and insurance companies use your responses in measuring physician quality?  Is it possible that what truly counts in medicine isn’t that easy to measure?

Comments

  1. In your own field, there are measures to evaluate your quality: time to cecum, cecal intubation rate, perforation rate, adenoma detection rate. Peer/chart review applies to any area of medicine; we could even have all doctor's clinics and all ER rooms have video cameras, audited by a peer a random 0.1% of the time.
    Complication rate applies to any procedural specialty. Failure to diagnose, failure to rescue apply to most specialties. A peer would have to make these determinations.
    If we would only get the socialism out of medicine and largely go back to fee-for-service, the market would do a lot of the regulating by itself (believe me, people would shop around, they would talk, word would get out regarding good and bad medical care.)
    I personally am a cynic; I don't believe that the government has any sincere interest in truly measuring medical quality. Just look at state licensing boards -- you practically have to molest patients to lose your license.

    --- the radical libertarian rural surgeon

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with some of your points and agree that you are a cynic. As far as the state of medical care today, elections matter. Fee-for-service medicine, my model, has issues related to conflicts of interest and over utilization. How's life in the rural hinterlands?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Regarding fee-for-service and issues of conflicts of interest and over-utilization:

    1. If the patient is truly paying for the medical care -- then frivolous over-utilization is not likely to happen. Do we tend to over-utilize plumbers and electricians? or lawyers? Of course we think long and hard about parting with our money. (Socialism, by contrast, is about spending someone else's money.)
    2. I grant that there is a conflict of interest issue and that no system is perfect (the auto mechanic has the same issue) -- but, isn't honesty the best policy? Wouldn't an honest MD and an honest mechanic come out fine in the end by earning trust, word-of-mouth referrals, and repeat business?
    3. Life out here is cold and windy and there are cows everywhere :) (mild exaggeration.) The ranchers are trying to make business for you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pleasse save the fee-for-service bashing. The devil we know is much better than the devil we don't. FFS incentives physicians to WORK! With a shortage of specialists and primary care, we better keep the accelerator pushed down. EVERY payment model has issues and I, for one, would like to know that when I do something, I get paid. Overutilization -- sure, probably but again, we will have to put up with issues in every payment model/scheme. Do we really belive "pay for performance" (whatever the hell that means) will be better?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not bashing FFS medicine, which is my own model. But, it's flaws need to be highlighted. There is no question that is a clear cause of overutilization which is destructive to the health care system and subjects patients to unnecessary medical care. I agree that every reimbursement model is flawed. The physician community bears some responsibility, in my view, for the current state of affairs. One reason that we are being 'reformed' is because we never reformed ourselves. Do you agree that our profession stood idly by and failed to act proactively thereby letting other forces take over?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have overutilization because for a year I've had a problem that the doctors check everything else but the suggested tests. You want to talk about how glad I would be to get rid of FFS? If they were graded on did they get the right answer, I'd not have as many complications right now because the original issue was missed. I put in writing each symptom and most of them are ignored.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary