Skip to main content

The Cost of Treating Uninsured Care - The Whistleblower Weighs In

Image
By

Last week, I posted on whether physicians should modify their medical advice in response to patients who cannot afford the recommended care.  A hypothetical patient was presented who had no medical insurance.  The clinical particulars suggested that a CAT scan of the abdomen was the ideal diagnostic test, but the patient would not be able to afford this.  I, therefore, offered readers several choices of medical advice, some of which was tailored to the patient’s financial situation. 


Here’s my view.   While there is very little in medicine or the world which should be absolute, medical advice must remain pure.  It should depend only upon the physician’s best medical judgment regardless of the patient’s financial situation.   A millionaire and a pauper who present to the doctor with an identical medical issue should receive the same medical recommendation.  Yes, I realize that patients are not interchangeable and that there are cultural, personality and religious differences that may affect the medical advice.  Leaving that aside, every patient is entitled to the practitioner’s best advice, regardless of the ability to afford this care.  If the right advice is an MRI examination, a colonoscopy, surgery or a medication whose yearly cost exceeds his yearly income, then the doctor must advise these options.  While we may feel we are being compassionate and understanding by trying to treat the patient on the cheap, when we do so, we are failing in our healing mission.  It’s not possible for an uninformed patient to provide informed consent. 

The patient will decide what he can afford.  First, it may be possible that he has access to resources that the physician does not suspect.  More important, the choice of rejecting medical advice because of cost is properly the patients’ – not ours.  It is for the patient to respond that he cannot afford the preferred medication and to then ask us what the alternatives are.  It is not for physicians to leapfrog over expensive medical care with the misguided view that we are being sensitive to a patient’s financial predicament.

So, do readers think that I am on the money here?
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJuly 10, 2013 at 2:35 PM

    Very interesting article. You make a great point- access to medicine should not be a luxury dictated by doctors. In fact, access to medicine should not be a luxury at all. If you wouldn't mind, please take a look at this Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/HealthWoWealth. It provides some interesting insight on how to make access to quality medicine a reality- an inexpensive reality. Your support would be much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

By
Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...
113 comments
Read more

When Should Doctors Retire?

By
I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...
69 comments
Read more

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

By
About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...
74 comments
Read more