Skip to main content

The Cost of Treating Uninsured Care - The Whistleblower Weighs In

Image
By

Last week, I posted on whether physicians should modify their medical advice in response to patients who cannot afford the recommended care.  A hypothetical patient was presented who had no medical insurance.  The clinical particulars suggested that a CAT scan of the abdomen was the ideal diagnostic test, but the patient would not be able to afford this.  I, therefore, offered readers several choices of medical advice, some of which was tailored to the patient’s financial situation. 


Here’s my view.   While there is very little in medicine or the world which should be absolute, medical advice must remain pure.  It should depend only upon the physician’s best medical judgment regardless of the patient’s financial situation.   A millionaire and a pauper who present to the doctor with an identical medical issue should receive the same medical recommendation.  Yes, I realize that patients are not interchangeable and that there are cultural, personality and religious differences that may affect the medical advice.  Leaving that aside, every patient is entitled to the practitioner’s best advice, regardless of the ability to afford this care.  If the right advice is an MRI examination, a colonoscopy, surgery or a medication whose yearly cost exceeds his yearly income, then the doctor must advise these options.  While we may feel we are being compassionate and understanding by trying to treat the patient on the cheap, when we do so, we are failing in our healing mission.  It’s not possible for an uninformed patient to provide informed consent. 

The patient will decide what he can afford.  First, it may be possible that he has access to resources that the physician does not suspect.  More important, the choice of rejecting medical advice because of cost is properly the patients’ – not ours.  It is for the patient to respond that he cannot afford the preferred medication and to then ask us what the alternatives are.  It is not for physicians to leapfrog over expensive medical care with the misguided view that we are being sensitive to a patient’s financial predicament.

So, do readers think that I am on the money here?
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJuly 10, 2013 at 2:35 PM

    Very interesting article. You make a great point- access to medicine should not be a luxury dictated by doctors. In fact, access to medicine should not be a luxury at all. If you wouldn't mind, please take a look at this Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/HealthWoWealth. It provides some interesting insight on how to make access to quality medicine a reality- an inexpensive reality. Your support would be much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

By
Next month my schedule will change.  I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday.   I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend.  And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me.  It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career.  It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves.  As some readers know,   my current employed position has been a dream job for me.   Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally.   My partner and I ran the business.   Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades.   On an on-call night, if I slept  through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery.   And w...
15 comments
Read more

When Should Doctors Retire?

By
I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...
69 comments
Read more

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

By
How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...
83 comments
Read more