One of the points I offer in this blog and elsewhere is to
be skeptical to assume that something is true because we think it should be.
We’ve been brainwashed to believe that obesity is a killer,
despite research performed this year concluding that a little more weight may
add years to your life. Many argue that
an assault weapons ban will save lives despite the absence of social science
research that supports this. Fewer guns
should save lives, right? When skeptics like me point to Chicago which boasts
extremely strict gun control legislation while being a murder theme park, we
are given excuses to reject the data that contradicts gun control dogma. Isn’t the term assault weapon itself unfairly
charged and loaded? I have supported
medical education reform advocating that medical residents and interns should
not be worked to exhaustion and yet be expected to administer high quality and
compassionate care to ill patients. I had
believed that somnambulating medical interns were more likely to harm patients
with careless care. I believed that this
was true because it seemed entirely self-evident.
Two recent studies published in the 3/25/13 issue of JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, suggest that I was wrong.
What should one do when a study contradicts a long held
view? Two choices to consider.
(1) Reflect, consider the quality of the new information and
modify your view.
(2) Attack the study as a Big Government, Big Oil or Big
Anything conspiracy and hold your ground.
The latest information suggests that interns and residents
who work fewer hours commit more errors.
Reasons include:
- While residents work less at the hospital, they aren’t sleeping more.
- Residents are now required to do the same amount of work in fewer hours.
- Shorter shifts mean more ‘hand-offs’ of patients to the next crew of eager interns.
Obviously, cramming in the same amount of high-pressure work
into fewer hours invites errors, particularly with relatively inexperienced
physicians who may not be adequately supervised at night. Medical handoffs are the event when interns
who are leaving the hospital sign over the care of their patients to the next
crew who must assume immediate responsibility for patients they may have never
seen. Hospitalized patients are
complex. The nuances of their condition
cannot be seamlessly transmitted to doctors-in-training in a few
sentences. An intern may have to assume
care of 10 or so new patients as he comes on shift. Would you feel at ease if you were one of
these patients? Indeed, one of the
defenses of the pre-reform system when interns were real men and worked until exhaustion
was that there were fewer dangerous medical handoffs.
Now, these two studies are not determinative. The increased error rates with shorter work
shifts were volunteered by the doctors themselves, which is not scientifically
rigorous. I’m not ready to abandon my view
that interns in my day were unnecessarily overworked, but it may be that the
reforms that are in place left now have left us too far from a humane end zone.
Not every hypothesis needs to be tested. Do we need a study to determine if highway
driving while wearing a blindfold is dangerous? Are we still entertaining the notion that it
is better for patients and young physicians to meet when the doctor is disoriented
from sleep deprivation? Is there really a need to torture interns to
buck them up for their later years in medical practice when they will likely sleep
soundly through most nights?
I’m against torture, even though I know its definition has
been a matter of public debate. Indeed,
I’m pleased that my views coincide with national policy.
"We Do Not Torture"
"We Waterboarded U.S.
Soldiers so it’s not Torture"
What if our senators and representatives had to legislate on
four hours of sleep each night? Care to
predict the outcome? Would the quality
of legislation, comity and bipartisanship flourish? One would surmise that exhausted congressmen
would commit more errors, but who knows?
I say, let’s try the experiment for a year to test this hypothesis which
may ultimately improve the political process.
I think there’s a reasonable prospect that congressional sleep
deprivation may improve quality considering that these self-promoting, self-aggrandizing,
self-serving and self-protective scoundrels have already hit bottom. There’s only one direction they can go. No need to sleep on this one.
I think there’s a reasonable prospect that congressional sleep deprivation may improve quality considering that these self-promoting, self-aggrandizing, self-serving and self-protective scoundrels have already hit bottom.
ReplyDeletePerhaps you're assuming facts not in evidence. Quite frankly, I think they are all armed with shovels, and despite their aversion to work, somehow seem committed to "keep digging." (IOW, with a shovel in hand, there IS no bottom.)
Melody
I could have gone to medical school, but I knew I didn't want to try to go through the marathon sleep deprivation of residency.
ReplyDelete