New Yorkers are headed toward leaner times. The New York City Health Board recently approved
a ban on large sized soft drinks proposed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Is Big Government now targeting Big People’s
Big Drinks? Does the government have the
right to restrict free choice 0n what we eat or drink? Does the argument that this is a necessary public
policy initiative pass the smell (or taste) test? Will this edict result in measurable weight
loss? Do we know as fact that weight
loss saves health care dollars or do we assume so simply because the conclusion
appears logical?
First, the policy is riddled with nonsensical exceptions. If banning large drinks is right and proper,
then why not ban them all, not just certain sizes at certain
establishments. Does it make sense to
ban large drinks at movie theaters, but permit continued guzzling at
convenience stores and vending machines?
If the product is evil, then shouldn’t any size of these life
threatening beverages be poured down the drain?
Does it make sense that unlimited refills of smaller size sodas are
permitted? So far, does the policy seem
rational and coherent?
Once the measure takes effect in March, movie patrons can still live
dangerously and stay within the law simply by ordering several smaller sizes of
the poison potions. Thirsty customers
can outfox the ban by purchasing multiple smaller sodas. These folks who are carrying 3 or 4 small
size drinks, rather than a supersize beverage, could easily spill them placing
themselves and other moviegoers at risk of serious injury. Those who adhere to the letter and spirit of
the new policy by purchasing only a single small beverage may not have sufficient
liquid to wash down the palm oil coated popcorn. As a gastroenterologist, I foresee several
cases of clogged esophaguses with popcorn gumming up gullets. I think the
government will have huge legal exposure on this issue.
Popcorn - An Innocent Victim
Do we think that New Yorkers who are forbidden to purchase large size drinks
at certain locales will seek out celery stalks and carrot sticks?
Folks who try hard to lose weight have a hard time doing so. Folks under the ban won’t get slimmer just
because the government restricts one food class at a certain size at some
locations.
Why stop at soda? If pop is the
enemy, then shouldn’t ice cream, candy, cake, doughnuts and fried foods be prohibited? I am sure there are those who would support a
government mandated menu that we would all be forced to swallow. For these do gooders, government knows best.
Explain to me please why banning soda is necessary public policy while
liquor and cigarettes are legal in any quantity.
I want to drink what I choose. But I'm not drinking the Kool Aid.
You have to eat 4 Big Macs to equal the fat content of a large bucket of buttered popcorn. Will butter be the next thing to go? What ever happened to people being responsible for their own actions and the consequences???
ReplyDeletePersonal responsibility? For my own knowledge, what planet do you inhabit?
ReplyDeleteI think increasing calorie content awareness and more education about nutrition may do more than this soft drink ban. What a waste of time and money!!!
ReplyDeleteEarth. Pass the popcorn.
ReplyDeleteI seem to be the lone dissenter so far, so here goes.
ReplyDeleteBy your own admission in your post about probiotics, nutrition is not one of your areas of expertise, calling it a 'soft subject' that was not included as part of your medical training. You then go on to not-so-thinly imply that wellness and preventive medicine are little more than New Age silliness, on par with incense and crystals. And now, on your rant about Big Gub'mint Soda Usurpation you highlight the myriad evils of government intervention into such matters as diet.
Perhaps if people like you, who are the subject matter experts in the structure and function of human digestion, took nutrition more seriously there would be no need for admittedly ham-handed government policies aimed at trying to do SOMETHING about the epidemic of adult AND childhood obesity.
Perhaps if people like you were more interested in the prevention of diet-related disease, instead of profiting handsomely from it, the information vacuum would not need to be filled by expensive, intrusive, and, usually, ineffective public policy mandates.
I don't at all disagree that much of the nutrition and wellness products industry is nothing more than junk science and slick marketing. But I suspect that your obvious disdain for non-FDA sanctioned remedies has less to do with a preference for the scientific method, and more to do with a generalized fear that your professions five-figure cash cows (e.g. colonoscopies) might one day be rendered obsolete by smaller portions, more nutrition education, and, quite possibly, a more effective digestive system courtesy of a little, round capsule.
To the lone dissenter above: Why remain anonymous? I agree with much of your comment but you are dead wrong that my views can be explained by a fear that my income might be threatened by any medical advance. If you take some time to read through other posts on this blog, particularly in the Ethics Quality section, you might realize that this gratuitious sentiment is misplaced. Nevertheless, I appreciate your view and thank you for commenting.
ReplyDeleteLooks like one guy didn't drink the soda ban Kool Aid! http://goo.gl/O8lT3
ReplyDeleteSoda has nothing to do with people getting obese in NYC or Worldwide. There many countries where soda is being sold and consumed every freken day and they do not consider soda to be the culprit of their obese population. What about Deserts served after dinner?...that's contain more sugar than soda...what about all the candy sold/used in Halloween? What about the crappy sugary treats your companies have at corporate for all the employees that work for you at Bloomberg? What about ice tea, ice cream, etc...etc...etc. ?.....dear Mr. Bloomberg, what really make people obese is the Saturated Fat amount on products that we consumed every day....I understand that Soda is not healthy, but don't just use it as the culprit that make people in NYC fat.
ReplyDelete- James
@NYC Body - well said. Big Gulp is not the enemy. Poor Bloomberg just took another hit on 'stop and frisk' yesterday.
ReplyDelete