Skip to main content

Why This Lawyer Won't Sue Me

I spent the entire last weekend with an attorney, not a desirable circumstance for most physicians. However, I wasn’t being deposed or interrogated on cross examination. This was a rendezvous that we both sought with enthusiasm.

Lewis is my closest friend, a bond that was forged since we were eight years old. We are separated now only by geography, and we meet periodically because we both treasure the friendship. Earlier this year we rolled the dice in Vegas. Last weekend, we sweated in the sweltering heat of the Mile High City. Next stop? Back to Denver with a few youngins'!

Lewis is the managing partner in a prominent west coast law firm that specializes in tax evasion. (Or is it tax avoidance? Am I confusing my terms here, Lew?) He has been redrafted to this position because he has earned the respect of his colleagues. Clearly, both Lewis and I have ascended to the highest strata of our professions. Lewis is in charge of a large law firm that has global reach; he travels all over the world cultivating business and negotiating deals; and he navigates clients through complex and labyrinthine legal conundrums. I, an esteemed community gastroenterologist, perform daily rectal examinations and counsel patients on flatulence.

I am sure that readers will agree that our future professional prestige is already evident in this photo of us taken several decades ago.

Lewis and me a few years ago

Among the many ponderous issues that we discussed, were the current state of each other’s profession. I enlightened Lewis that electronic medical records (EMR) has not yet fulfilled its promise of ease of use and integration with other medical offices and institutions. I shared my disapproval of ‘point & click’ medicine, which is the default mode of many EMR systems. I also opined that EMR has created many viable avenues for medical malpractice attorneys to pursue. For example, is it now the community standard for physicians with EMR to search surrounding medical databases during an office visit to gather results of all prior laboratory and radiology records from area hospitals if it is technically possible to do so? If a patient sees me to discuss the heartbreak of hemorrhoids, am I negligent if I do not perform a wide data search and discover that an ultrasound of the liver done 2 years ago for other reasons showed a small lesion that in 3 months would become a serious clinical issue?  Am I now responsbible for every lab and x-ray result that is within cyber reach?  Sure EMR can save the doctor, but it can sink him also.

Lewis shared his views on the state of our economy, the current tax structure and the fairness and efficiency of our legal system. His colorful descriptions of these and other issues cannot be reproduced here verbatim as this is a family blog. Using softer language and paraphrasing, he did not exude optimism for America’s future.

He related some of his interesting legal matters, and I shared anecdotes from my gastroenterology practice. This created an interesting philosophical question. Consider the following 2 inquiries.

If a tree falls in the woods, and no one hears it, has noise occurred?


If a doctor mentions a patient and his diagnosis, and no one hears it, has HIPPA been violated?

Luckily, I always travel with my HCH, a HIPPA Compliant Helmet, a device that resembles a CPAP apparatus that sleep apnea patients wear at night. Once fitted with the device, any patient’s name I utter becomes encrypted and emerges from my mouth as a Disney character.

If I Say...                                You Will Hear...

Joe Bellamy                                     Goofy

Susan Sherman                                Dopey

Karen Carmichael                            Dumbo


My HIPPA helmet this past weekend was strapped in tightly, even during sleep in the event I somnambulated and started murmuring privileged patient information. Sure, Lewis is my best friend. But, he is also a lawyer and he might have been wearing a wire. After all, business is business. 

We actually discovered common elements in our jobs.

  • We can’t guarantee the outcome to those we counsel.
  • We are routinely blamed for adverse outcomes that are not our fault.
  • Both of our professions are screaming for reform, but politics won’t permit it to happen.
We didn’t solve all of the world’s problems, but many of the intractable issues we did discuss seemed like they could be solved if 10 reasonable folks around a table could hash it out without political interference.

Real friendship matters. A lawyer and a physician are an ideal combination, as odd as this sounds. Sometimes the relationship may need the skills of a negotiator, and other times it may need some healing. If you are really lucky, as we are, the friendship just coasts on naturally, powered by the strength of a bond that in a few years will reach a half century mark.


Lewis and me today

Comments

  1. Sweet! Glad you have that "bro" experience with a brewski and shared philosophy.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good?  Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it.  While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession.  Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves?  Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students.  I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...