Skip to main content

Electronic Medical Records: The Fear Factor

A paperless society is approaching for all of us, which sadly will include the demise of my beloved New York Times, which I cherish each day. Our medical practice will have electronic medical records (EMR) in the foreseeable future, if we can mollify the objections of one of our technophobic physicians. There are several reasons why most physicians haven’t made the move to EMR yet.

First, it is not easy to learn. This is not like getting a new e-mail address. It is a complex software system that is like a giant onion with endless layers of functions that will perform office tasks that have been successfully done manually for decades. It introduces an entirely new computerized culture into the office. This adjustment is particularly difficult for doctors who were not trained in the I-pod era. However, even for the cybersavvy, learning these complicated systems takes months. During this training period, patients, doctors and staffs become frustrated when it takes 10 minutes or longer to perform a task using EMR that could be done in 5 seconds the old fashioned way. During this transition period, patient volume and practice revenue will decline creating financial pressure for the practice. Patients will wait longer in waiting rooms. When they do reach the exam rooms, they will enjoy the entertainment of watching their doctors fumbling with electronic equipment. At least, patients won’t complain about rushed office visits, since their doctors will now be spending plenty of time slipping and sliding on the electronic learning curve.

An EMR computer glitch can shut down a medical office STAT. After a couple of these unfortunate episodes, the frustrated doctor and the frazzled office staff will need to be treated for anxiety and high blood pressure. If the vendor does not provide the urgent tech support that was promised before the sale, then the office chatter will include words and phrases not suitable for a family blog.

These systems are expensive. While a hospital or large institution that is spending someone else’s money can afford it, costs for smaller practices can be prohibitive. Profit margins for many medical practices today are extremely narrow as a consequence of declining reimbursements and rising overhead costs. These practices will confront an enormous financial challenge once EMR is required, unless the cost is substantially reduced or subsided. The Obama administration is prepared to devote large sums of money to incentivize physicans to adopt EMR, but many experts maintain that physician costs would still be prohibitive for many small practices.

EMR systems must be compatible with other software. Would our office, for example, want to invest the money and time in a system that didn’t cleanly interface with all of the different hospitals we work at?

Finally, there are confidentiality issues to be addressed. Despite encryption and other techniques, would patients’ privacy be protected? Your medical record would not in a chart in a filing cabinet, but would be floating in cyberspace. Could security be guaranteed?

EMR is coming and it can’t be stopped. Despite what the salesmen promise, it will cost more than they say, it will be harder to learn than they promise and it will crash more often than they predict. Our office expects to plunge into EMR this year. I expect that it will be as pleasant and comfortable as a 6 month root canal procedure.

These are some technical concerns of going paperless. EMR also is a direct threat to the doctor-patient relationship. This deserves its own posting. Click here to link.


  1. I agree with you. EMR will be here and it is a good thing. Overtime all the different EMR will have to interact with each other. It has initial cost attached to it, but it will save duplicate workup and will cut cost of medical care. It should result in to higher reimbursement and better care for the patient.
    As far as technophobe doctors are concerned, just like anything if one does not adapt one becomes irrelevant. I hope all the good talented physician welcome this change.
    so long...

  2. Good points. I hope you are right, but many experts aren't so sure that EMR's many promises will be kept, particularly regarding cost savings. I just met with an EMR vendor yesterday who promises the Garden of Eden. I fear that we will have to go through Sodom and Gomorrah to get there.

  3. I improperly implemented and used EMR will allow more physicians to hurt more patients faster than ever while at the same time increasing revenue! EHR is not designed to change incentives and unfortunately it is built to accomodate the completely counterproductive E/M coding rules that add nothing to patient care but are essential for maximizing income. Too much hype. EHR is the easy answer that is completely wrong. That being said - with the proper design and in the hands of a motivated intelligent user its a great tool - just like a laparascope or scapel.

  4. Because EMR will crash -- and because it will, as you say, take a long time to implement -- I wonder if MDs aware of these problems are making efforts to improve the speed, legibility, and accident-resistance of their handwriting.

    Medically oriented resources are already marketed for that purpose: e.g., the BETTER LETTERS "personal handwriting trainer" app for the iPhone, iPodTouch, and iPad -- -- and the DOCTOR HANDWRITING REPAIR PowerPoint --

    Also see my web-site:

  5. Thank you Dr for sharing your thoughts. It is interesting to read.EMR is not so complicated as mentioned. It is simple, and user friendly nowadays. It will take just seconds to finish a task.I prefer PracticeSuite EMR software for my billing. Practicesuite have following billing softwares : Chiropractic billing software, Physical therapy billing software, Mental health billing software, Revenue Cycle Management EMR Software etc..


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Why This Doctor Gave Up Telemedicine

During the pandemic, I engaged in telemedicine with my patients out of necessity.  This platform was already destined to become part of the medical landscape even prior to the pandemic.  COVID-19 accelerated the process.  The appeal is obvious.  Patients can have medical visits from their own homes without driving to the office, parking, checking in, finding their way to the office, biding time in the waiting room and then driving out afterwards.  And patients could consult physicians from far distances, even across state lines.  Most of the time invested in traditional office visits occurs before and after the actual visits.  So much time wasted! Indeed, telemedicine has answered the prayers of time management enthusiasts. At first, I was also intoxicated treating patients via cyberspace, or telemedically, if I may invent a term.   I could comfortably sink into my own couch in sweatpants as I guided patients through the heartbreak of hemorrhoids and the distress of diarrhea.   Clear

Do Doctors Talk to Each Other?

 I will share with readers a recent occurrence between me and another doctor that was both rare and refreshing.  I was serving as the gastrointestinal consultant on one of the doctor’s patients.  I performed a scope examination of the stomach and obtained some routine biopsy specimens.  The pathology results were abnormal, but benign.  No urgent action was needed, but a full airing of the significance of the results would require a conversation between me and the patient in an office visit.  I notified the patient that there was no medical threat at all and we would unpack it all during his next visit. The referring physician wondered about this delay, which perhaps is a different style from other gastroenterologists (GI’s) who he works with.   (My guess is that other GI’s may opt to handle the issue with the patient on the phone or via the portal. I think, however, that there’s too much complexity to fully address this issue in this manner.) So, here’s what the referring doctor did.