MD Whistleblower

I write to you now from the west side of Cleveland in a coffee shop with my legs perched upon a chair.  Just finished the last Op-Ed of interest in today’s New York Times.  Do I sound relaxed? I rounded this morning at both of the community hospitals that we serve.  There is not a day that goes by that doesn’t have blogworthy moments.  If I had the time and the talent, I would post daily instead of weekly.   Read on for yet another true medical insider’s disclosure. Gastroenterologists, as specialists, are called upon by other doctors to address digestive issues in their patients.  For example, our daily office schedule is filled with patients sent by primary care physicians who want our advice or our technical testing skills to evaluate individuals with abdominal pain, bowel issues, heartburn, rectal bleeding and various other symptoms.  The same process occurs when we are called to see hospital patients.   If a hospital admitting physician, who is usually a hospitalist, want

What is the explanation for Tom Price, a physician and current Secretary of Health and Human Services, taking private charter flights costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars?  Keep in mind that when Price was a conservative congressman from Georgia, he would have railed against such fiscal profligacy.  Is it hubris?  Entitlement?  Or, do folks who ascend to positions of power simply rationalize that such excesses are absolute necessities for getting the job done? By the time this piece is posted, Dr. Price, an orthopedic surgeon, may have been surgically excised from the government without anesthesia.  While his behavior is not quite Watergate, it was wrong.  And, if it was not wrong, it demonstrated impaired judgment.  And, if was not simply a repeated exercise of misjudgments, then it exhibited bad optics.  And, if it somehow passed the optics test, it was just dumb.  Would Price have been able to explain these expensive charter flights to average folks, half

The Graham-Cassidy bill – the latest Repeal and Replace iteration - still has a pulse, but its prognosis is grave.   While we physicians generally avoid predicting outcomes, my sense is that this bill will be buried in the coming days.  I presume that once its passage becomes mathematically impossible, that the bill will be pulled. Of course, failure to Repeal and Replace is a horrendous embarrassment and exposure of the Republicans who have been campaigning and crusading against Obamacare with religious zeal these past 7 years.   These patriots knew they could safely rail against the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – throwing red meat to their base – knowing that the bills would never pass while a Democratic president occupied the White House.   How ironic it is that now that the GOP have congressional majorities that they couldn’t get it done.  Not only could they not run the ball into the end zone, but they repeatedly fumbled at every opportunity into the hands of waiting Democrats. 

Most of us do not know the basics of economics, although we should.  It impacts every one of us every day that we are alive.  Yet, for most of us, once we get beyond the law of supply and demand, our knowledge of the subject starts to vaporize.  I can't explain fiscal or monetary policy.  While I regard economics as a science, it seems that experts routinely interpret data differently, which confuses beginners like me.  What are novices to think when one expert hails our continued job gains while another laments our anemic recovery? The Puppeteers I have a general feel for market forces.  If consumer demand for an item rises, then I will expect to pay more.  If I want to make a purchase at an independent appliance store, then I will expect to pay more in return for superior customer service.  If the item is manufactured in China, it will likely cost me less as this factory is not burdened with worker protections, environmental regulation and union wages. The above

If any reader has heard of C. difficile, affectionately known as C. diff, than I presume you have had closer contact with this germ than you would have liked.  It’s an infection of the colon that can be serious, or even fatal.  There isn’t a hospital in the country that isn’t battling against the infection.   We are not winning the war against this crafty and cunning adversary.  We Need Better Weapons Against C. diff While the infection is not new, the strength and seriousness of current strains of the germ have tilted the odds against doctors and our patients.  The infection usually is a ‘side-effect’ of antibiotic treatment, but it can also be contracted from infected surfaces and people that reside in hospitals and extended care facilities and nursing homes.  For example, nowadays a patient can be admitted to a hospital and pick up the germ from hospital personnel who are contaminated from contact with an actual C. diff patient.  For this reason, C diff patients are k

Couldn't cover every tool or trade here, but a shout out to all.   All work is honorable. Warm wishes from the Whistelblower.

I have written about talcum powder previously.  Indeed, I have not only opined on the slippery substance, but I am also a regular consumer of the product.  Talcum powder has become magic legal dust that brings forth zillions of dollars to those who have been attacked by the poisonous toxin.  Just last year, I informed readers of $55 million and $72 million judgments to cancer victims who used powder against the manufacturer Johnson & Johnson.  Earlier this year a Missouri woman was awarded $110 in damages.  Recently, a jury in California, where the cost of everything is stratospheric, ordered J & J to pay damages to a victim of ovarian cancer.   The jury clearly wanted to send the company and corporate America a monetary message that went beyond the pinprick judgements that were issued against J & J last year.  Readers at this point are invited to consider what would constitute reasonable damages if it were proven true that the product caused the cancer and th

While I typically offer readers thoughts and commentary on the medical universe, or musings on politics, I am serving up some lighter fare today.  Hopefully, unlike the patient highlighted below, you will be able to chew on, swallow and digest this post.  If this blog had a category entitled, A Day in the Life of a Gastroenterologist, this piece would reside there. I was called to the emergency room yesterday to attend to an elderly woman who had steak lodged in her esophagus.  While this sounds life threatening to ordinary folks, it poses no mortal danger.  The airway is uninvolved and normal respirations proceed without interruption. These patients, while fully alive, are rather uncomfortable.  This is one of the tasks that gastroenterologists are routinely called to undertake, often at inhospitable hours. Sometimes, these folks have known esophageal narrowed regions where food that is not masticated with enthusiasm can hold up.  On other occasions, a person with a t

I was asked this week for an informal opinion by someone who was advised by his dermatologist to take a biologic medicine for psoriasis.   Now, my knowledge of this disorder is barely skin deep, yet knowledge alone will not set you free in the murky world of medicine.  Knowing something is not as significant as knowing when to do something. Can guacamole really cause cancer?  Read on. Biologic medicines, which have surpassed in frequency the nearly omnipresent TV ads for erectile dysfunction, are expensive medications that have risks of serious, albeit uncommon, side effects.  And, unlike chemotherapy for cancer, which has a finite course, biologic medicines are administered forever, that is without a clear stopping point.  The individual who questioned me was not suffering from insufferable psoriasis and was satisfied with the conventional topical treatments he has been using for years.  His dermatologist offered the biologic in an effort to reduce his risk of heart d

We cannot let the anecdote rule over us.   We don’t make sound policy if we are swayed by isolated emotional vignettes.  Of course, a vignette describes a living, breathing human being, but we must consider the greater good, the overall context and the risk of letting our hearts triumph over our heads when making general policy.  Consider these examples. If an expensive drug treatment program keeps 5 addicts clean for 6 months, do we champion this success in asking for funding to be renewed while omitting that 400 enrolled addicts failed? If an experimental medical treatment seems to be effective in one patient with a stubborn disease, should physicians lurch toward it leaving aside standard treatments which have been subjected to Food and Drug Administration approval and years of clinical experience? If a high school student attends an SAT prep course and achieves a near perfect score, do we conclude that every student should enroll in this course? It is natural to b

Each morning, as I read the newspapers in view of 3 birdfeeders, I send excerpts of news morsels to various individuals in an effort to stimulate a dialogue on issues of the day.  I am mindful how deluged we all are with a tsunami of unsolicited material.  I will not contribute to the cyber pile-on.  First, I’ll never forward an article that I have not read in full.  Secondly, I will send an item to an individual only if I have judged beyond a reasonable doubt that this person will feel that the time investment in the material will be judged to be time well spent.  I engage in an active colloquy with one of my good pals, who is among the millions of Whistleblower readers who ponder these posts each week.  To my knowledge, he has never left a comment on the blog, which is somewhat unexpected of this rather voluble individual.   As he has opted to remain anonymous, I will not ‘out’ him here, although perhaps this post may be the catalyst to morph him from spectator to participant.

Today's patients must adjust to seeing many physicians, many of whom are strangers.   If you need a doctor on the weekend, at night or just need a ‘same day appointment’, you may very well not be seen by your physician.  This is not your father’s medical practice.  The days of the physician house call have vanished.   There are many reasons responsible for this evolution (?devolution) in medical care.  Patients have by and large adjusted to this new reality. Housecall with some Old Fashioned Bloodletting We physicians have had to adjust as well.  Formerly, we took care of our patients exclusively, with rare exceptions when we were out of town.  If you went to the hospital, we were there.  Same day appointment needed?  We squeezed you in.   There was no nurse practitioner to pick up the slack.  While I’m not making a judgment on the mediical merits, physicians of yesteryear were more devoted to their patients and their profession than they were to their own lifestyles, a fa