Skip to main content

Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Placebo Effect or Panacea?

Readers know that I am skeptical over the efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine.  This is not merely a demonstration of my inborn skepticism, but doubt based on the fact the so much of their claims are untested, unproven or refuted.

I don’t regard the above comment as controversial.  It is factual.   I’ll let readers decide if it is but another example of the arrogance of conventional physicians who worship on the altar of evidence based medicine. 
Recently, I read a column in The New York Times by a university professor who was treated for a cold in China by drinking fresh turtle blood laced with grain alcohol.  In a day or two, he felt better.  Cause and effect?

 It’s not easy to talk someone out of a view that a pseudoscientific remedy healed them.  Why should we do so?   If a patient tells me that his fatigue has finally lifted after giving up guacamole, do I serve him or the profession by pointing out the absence of any scientific basis for his renewed energy level?   Or, is the better response for me to celebrate his progress and urge him to continue his ‘treatment’ which clearly poses no health risk?

Guac anyone?

Certainly, if I felt a patient was pursuing an alternative medical treatment, or any remedy, that threatened his health, I would plainly state this so the patient was making an informed choice.  If a patient was suffering from a bleeding ulcer, and wanted only herbal medicines, I would make sure that the risks of this choice were well understood.

I need to make a confession here.   Physicians face a huge knowledge vacuum with regard to the human body which is the product of millions of years of natural selection.  We are no match for comprehending its nuances and complexity.  Taking care of patients is a hugely humbling experience.  Consider how microscopic germs, organisms that are not sentient and have no brains, can wipe out millions of humans.   We should acknowledge that we’re not that smart.

There’s another possibility to be considered when a patient relates the success of remedy that we don’t support or understand.  It might actually be working.

Have you been tired lately?  Fatigued?   How much guac have you had lately?  


  1. Oddly, complecting with your gravedo 'cure', I just read Oswell Livingstone's (son of Dr. David L) mention of a rouser produced by his father:

    "Dr. and Mrs Kirk have boon extremely good to us, putting themselves to no end of trouble on our account. If it were not for them we should be nowhere. Since we came both Dr. and Mrs Kirk have boon down with fever. 1 found two of our Nassick boys dying yesterday; but after a dose of 'rouser' (Dr. Living stone's prescription) and quinine, they have recovered most wonderfully."

    Interesting that the duo remedy proved to recure with only one dose but both resile situations could be iatrochemical, or related to the effects of poculation

  2. By coincidence, I wrote about the same column by Stephen Asma about Chinese medicine. My take on it, however, was that whatever the merits of turtle blood, some traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is not only clinically effective, but can be proven in the laboratory. As this link will tell you, I am the author of a new book about Dr. Xiu-Min Li at Mount Sinai in New York who has been using TCM to treat conditions that have defied mainstream treatment, and in parallel verifying their action via NIH/FDA protocols.

  3. Pretty good post. I found your website perfect for my needs. Thanks for sharing the great ideas.


  4. There are times that we encounter fear and disappointments in life yet we still manage to stand up straight and face it rather that being silent. That was a very good example of being a brave person. Well, I would like to thank you for sharing a very good article it is very much appreciated, good job! You can visit my site too if you want. Have a great day.Enjoy!

  5. Thank you, Dr. Whistleblower, for being open-minded. I am in the alternative health care field, and acknowledge that many of the treatments in this field are nothing more than 'faith-based cures'. However, many of them are science-based (the term 'alternative medicine' refers to a very broad spectrum of different approaches), they just have not been thoroughly studied yet, and therefore earn the title 'unproven'. Regardless, patients find them to be efficacious time and time again, when their evidence based docs have failed them. I just finished reading another blog post of yours about chronic abdominal pain, and how conventional medicine rarely can do anything to alleviate it. This is exactly the kind of condition that alternative medicine often has success in treating. I wish more MDs would be open-minded enough to realize that while there are some conditions that evidence-based medicine does very well to treat (you really don't want a naturopathic doctor for a broken bone, for example), there are some conditions, usually chronic, where naturopathic or alternative treatments are far more successful.

  6. Unproven or untested doesn't mean ineffective. Nevertheless, we need to be forthright and admit when a proposed therapy has no supportive science behind it.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why This Doctor Gave Up Telemedicine

During the pandemic, I engaged in telemedicine with my patients out of necessity.  This platform was already destined to become part of the medical landscape even prior to the pandemic.  COVID-19 accelerated the process.  The appeal is obvious.  Patients can have medical visits from their own homes without driving to the office, parking, checking in, finding their way to the office, biding time in the waiting room and then driving out afterwards.  And patients could consult physicians from far distances, even across state lines.  Most of the time invested in traditional office visits occurs before and after the actual visits.  So much time wasted! Indeed, telemedicine has answered the prayers of time management enthusiasts. At first, I was also intoxicated treating patients via cyberspace, or telemedically, if I may invent a term.   I could comfortably sink into my own couch in sweatpants as I guided patients through the heartbreak of hemorrhoids and the distress of diarrhea.   Clear

Am I Spreading Covid-19 Misinformation?

I presume that most of us are hostile to hate speech, misinformation and disinformation.  Politicians and others want social media to be scrubbed of all nefarious postings.  Twitter is most recently in the crosshairs on this issue after Elon Musk assumed ownership of the company.  They still haven’t settled on a moderation policy.  Social media and other information sources have been accused of radicalizing Americans, fostering hate, undermining our elections, providing a forum for bullies and predators, promoting division and coarsening our national discourse.  One man’s cleansing of disinformation is another man’s censorship. There is some speech that all reasonable people would agree should be banned, such as incitement to violence or prurient matter that children can access.   I challenge those who advocate against publishing hate speech, misinformation or disinformation to offer precise definitions of these categories.   Trust me, this is no easy endeavor.     And if you are

Whistleblower Grand Rounds Vol. 6 No. 22: It’s ‘Alimentary’, Doctors!

It’s been a while since I’ve attended a conventional medical Grand Rounds. These were events where a medical luminary would fly in to give a medical audience a state-of-the-art presentation on a medical subject. Ideally, the speaker was a thought leader and a researcher on the issue. These presentations were usually not a demonstration of the virtue of humility. We physicians, as a class, have generous egos. Academic physicians occupy a higher rung on the ego ladder. Medical Grand Rounders (MGRs), who are on the GR speaking circuit, often must bring their own ladders to assure they will be able to reach their desired atmospheric height. Jacob’s Ladder Photo Credit At least in the old days, before the GR speaker would assume his position behind the rostrum, a designated pre-speaker would offer an introduction. The audience would hear a list of awards, achievements, journal editorial positions, department chairmanships, honorary degrees, publications and book chapter authorships,