Promoting medical marijuana use is hot – smokin’ hot. States are racing to legalize this product,
both for recreational and medical use.
In my view, there’s a stronger case to be made for the former than the
latter.
Presently, marijuana is a Schedule I drug, along with
heroin, LSD and Ecstasy. The Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) defines this category as drugs with no acceptable
medical use and a high potential risk of addiction. Schedule I contains drugs that the FDA deems
to be the least useful and most dangerous.
Schedule V includes cough medicine containing codeine.
On its face, it is absurd that marijuana and heroin are
Schedule I soulmates. I expect that the
FDA will demote marijuana to a more benign category where it belongs. It will certainly have to if marijuana is
going to be approved as a medicine.
There is no question that some advocates favoring
medicalization of marijuana were using this as a more palatable route to
legitimize recreational use. The
strategy was to move incrementally with the hope that over time the ball would
cross the goal line. We have seen this
same approach with so many other reforms, legal decisions and societal
acceptances, many of which we take for granted.
Consider gay marriage and women’s role in the military as two examples
of goals that required a long journey to reach.
Marijuana has had no personal or professional role in my
life. I do not object to responsible
recreational use and would support such a measure. To criminalize marijuana use while cigarettes,
chewing tobacco and alcohol are entirely legal seems inconsistent and
hypocritical. Is smoking marijuana more
dangerous than riding a motorcycle?
Paradoxically, I have hesitancy at this point to endorse
medical marijuana use based on the fragmentary data that supports its
efficacy. If you ‘Google’ this subject,
and you believe what you read, you will conclude that marijuana is the panacea
we’ve been waiting for. It helps
nausea, neuropathic (nerve) pain, glaucoma, muscle spasms, Crohn’s disease,
multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, Hepatitis C, migraines, arthritis, Alzheimer’s
disease, cancer and numerous other ailments.
Do we accept so readily that one agent can effectively attack such a
broad range of unrelated illnesses? It
sounds more like snake oil than science.
Cure is Just a Puff Away!
Shouldn’t high quality medical studies demonstrate
benefit before we sanction medical marijuana use?
The medical profession and our patients should demand that
all our medicines be rigorously tested for safety and efficacy. I realize that there is huge public
acceptance that marijuana is real medicine.
Not so fast. Let the FDA evaluate
marijuana as it does for all medications and treatments. I do not think we should relax our
professional standards just because the public is willing to inhale without
evidence and entrepreneurs want to cash in.
If you had a chronic disease, would you expect your doctor
to offer you a medicine with definite risks but no proven benefit? Why would you accept it and why would he
prescribe it?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete