Skip to main content

Obama's Health Care Reform: An Indecent Proposal


We watched the marriage on national TV. Both sides said, ‘I do’, as they faced a fawning audience of the press and government dignitaries. The couple, arm and arm, started ambling toward their parked limousine, festooned with bright Just Married signs.

Newlyweds, usually wives, track many of the first events in a marriage. One of the recorded stats is the first argument. When it occurs, savvy husbands should save time and themselves by apologizing profusely and admitting shame and remorse. For most couples, this inevitable post-nuptial event occurs weeks or months after the solemn wedding vows are expressed.

In the White House marriage we watched last Monday between Obama and a coalition of health care groups, the sniping started barely after they left the chapel. Wise bloggers had predicted this outcome, but I admit that I was mildly shocked at the speed that the bride pursued an annulment. What went wrong? Did that prankster Cupid dip his arrows into a vat of single-payer elixir poisoning the affair? This is not a simple example of wedding day ‘cold feet’. It’s more like frostbite.

We all heard the terms of the wedding contract read to us by the proud husband. The 6 medical groups would voluntarily set aside their own interests to serve America. Over the next decade, they would each shave off 1.5% of health care spending, which would save the system over $2 trillion. While successful marriages demand compromises, this agreement sounded hollow to even casual observers of the health care reform process. Groups and individuals will give in to serve the greater good, but they won’t agree to self-destruct. .

The medical groups, barely out of their white gowns, cried foul. “We never agreed to that”, they announced in unison. They issued ‘clarifications’ and tried to set the record straight about what commitments were actually made, which all sides agreed were voluntary and unenforceable. (Shouldn’t Obama, a trained lawyer, have insisted on a pre-nuptial agreement just in case the romance faded?) The medical groups now stated that there was no firm agreement on annual targets, only goals that they would incrementally pursue. Sounds like a he-said she-said spat where each side has its own version of the facts.

This is a very inauspicious beginning of health care reform and a reminder its complexity. The health care players will now become even more suspicious of the president and will be more reluctant to walk down the aisle with him. There will be no shotgun weddings or elopements. Interest groups will insist on very long engagements and will use the time to gain the most favorable terms possible or to derail the effort entirely. Don’t expect hospitals, physicians, insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, etc. to fall on their swords on the altar of health care reform. They know that this is going to be a long chess game and a bad move early in the game could doom the outcome for them months or years from now. Pharmaceutical companies, for example, are doubling down and are pouring money into their lobbying coffers. Obama has to decide whether to proceed with a frontal assault, pursue a flanking maneuver or try to divide and weaken the opposition.

While Obama will revise his tactics, he won’t modify his ultimate objective. I think he knows exactly what he wants our health care system to be, but he hasn’t come clean with us yet. I suppose that every husband is entitled to keep some secrets.

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Looks like a resourceful website! Thanks for sharing

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting site, but much advertisements on him. Shall read as subscription, rss.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am happy to find result here in the post, thanks for sharing.
    acrylic nail

    ReplyDelete
  8. Awesome! Some really helpful information in there. Bookmarked. Excellent source. Html to pdf

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You write very well, very, very exciting, if there is a good article, I will come, but I like

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary