Skip to main content

Medicare Reform Will Raise Physician Howls!


I am flattered that influential U.S. senators must be reading MDWhistleblower for important policy advice. Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, and Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa issued proposals that aim to change the Medicare payment system to doctors and hospitals. Payment would be directly linked to quality, rather than to volume of services. Under the present system, if a surgeon operates on a patient 3 times to correct his own complications, he is paid more than a colleague who got it right the first time. However, as discussed in many prior postings on this blog, medical quality is very difficult to measure.

One of the senators’ specific proposals receives a 5 Star Whistleblower Award for medical quality. The government will aim to reduce the excessive use of CAT scans, MRIs and other advanced medical imaging techniques that cost a fortune and create unnecessary medical cascades that chase after trivial lesions that will never cause illness. (Click here for a related rant. ) While I am reluctant for the government to be the one establishing the national radiography standards, as the senators propose, I endorse the concept enthusiastically. If physicians were smarter, we would be devising quality standards ourselves before the government and insurance companies do so in the near future.

One of the failings of the medical profession is that whenever there was a need for reform, we remained passive. Then, after the ‘reformers’ and bureaucrats stormed in and attacked the problem we ignored, we physicians howled in protest. This time, a medical reform tsunami is approaching and most doctors will drown in denial. Do you have a good pair of earplugs? You will need them because there will soon be ear piercing howling from hamlets, towns and cities across America.

Comments

  1. Too true. Lack of accountability has left a giant gap for regulators to drive through and wreak havoc on the 'profession'. Health care is a house of cards which will come crashing down when people realize how little the economy needs health care. Most primary care doctors tell me that 1/3 to 1/2 of visits are not needed. Dangerous, inefficient polypharmacy is the rule. I used to stop lipitor in at least one 20-30 year new patient old every week, showing them the risk calculation from Framingham. And a lot of doctors are still insisting that the pharm marketing 'has no influence on my prescribing' Ha!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment. I think there is a distinction between "how little the economy needs health care" and the excessive amount of medicine being practiced. While medicine is a financial drain, it does contribute enormously to the economy in medical care, research, biomedical engineering, biotechnology, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The government will aim to reduce the excessive use of CAT scans, MRIs and other advanced medical imaging techniques that cost a fortune and create unnecessary medical cascades ..."

    Great but how will they change the medical liability issues that drive this problem??

    In New Zealand, where the ambulance chasers don't exist FAR fewer 'advanced imaging' studies are carried out through ER visits. Tort reform First! There are other drivers, but ...

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Nw Zealand concept won't take off here in the U.S. The idea makes too much sense.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I couldn't agree more with your comment here or your recent post on the WSJ blog.

    My one addition would be to note that all major changes need to be systemic. For example, if doctors currently reduce MRI's how legally exposed are they in the .001% of the cases where it really would have found an underlying problem. Even more critical is the patient who often demand every test, not every doctor is able to push back each and every time.

    Health care is a very intertwined ecosystem - most often the only way to change one part is to concurrently have to change several, which is why its so damn hard

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dr. Kirsch, You are doing your part. Hopefully other doctors realize the need asap. Otherwise, if many issues are not addressed and acted on from within what is to be expected other than the outside blundering in, out of necessity.

    People out here notice and appreciate a valiant attempt.

    Patricia

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks Patricia. Unfortunately, the physician community is divided on many issues. This reduces our influence in the health care reform process. As you point out, when a group doesn't reform itself, then others will step in and do it for them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary