Doctors Performing Unnecessary Medical Procedures

If a patient wants a colonoscopy done, and it’s not medically indicated, should the doctor still do it?

If the physician complies with this request, has he or she committed an ethical breach? Should the medical board or some other disciplinary agency be notified to investigate?

Of course, in a perfect world every medical procedure or prescription would be advised only if it is medically indicated. But the world is not perfect and there are instances when good physicians may deviate from evidenced-based medical practice. Additionally, there may be disputes among medical professional if a proposed medical intervention is indicated or not. Medicine is an art...

Doctors Performing Unnecessary Medical Procedures

We inhabit an imperfect world.

Consider these examples and whether you think a disciplinary response is appropriate.

A patient is due for his next screening colonoscopy in 2 years, which would be 10 years since his last exam. He approaches his doctor with anxiety because his coworker was just diagnosed with colon cancer. He asks that a colonoscopy be scheduled now. The doctor agrees.
A patient wants his colonoscopy performed in December, after his deductible has been satisfied, rather than wait until July of the following year when he is officially due for his next exam. The physician accedes to this request.
A referring physician requests that his patient undergoes a screening colonoscopy earlier than advised because he feels that the published guidelines from screening are too relaxed. The gastroenterologist complies.
An elderly patient has some modest bowel concerns. The gastroenterologist does not suspect that these symptoms portend a serious issue. The patient is accompanied by her two children who are firm in their desire that their mother undergoes a colonoscopy to assure that all is well. The patient grudgingly agrees to proceed. The doctor schedules the procedure.

So, should these ‘rogue doctors’ be disciplined? Or, are these simply examples of imperfect practitioners functioning in an imperfect world trying to satisfy imperfect patients? When can physicians deviate from published medical guidelines? Who draws the line? How much flexibility should doctors be afforded to accommodate to patients, their families and referring medical professionals? Are these examples of physician flexibility fair to the payors?

What is the definition of a medically indicated procedure? This is more challenging than it seems. Try crafting one and I submit that there will be many justifiable procedures that your definition would exclude.

Comments

Becoming a Part-Time Physician

Next month my schedule will change. I will henceforth be off on Fridays with my work week truncated to Monday through Thursday. I am excited to be enjoying a long weekend every weekend. And while the schedule change is relatively minor, this event does feel like an important career moment for me. It is the first step on a journey that will ultimately lead beyond my professional career. It is this recognition that makes this modest schedule modification more significant than one would think it deserves. As some readers know, my current employed position has been a dream job for me. Prior to this, I was in a small private practice, which I loved, but was much more challenging professionally and personally. My partner and I ran the business. Working nights, weekends and holidays were routine for decades. On an on-call night, if I slept through until morning, I felt as if I had won the lottery. And w...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term. Years ago, I never received such inquiries. Why now? Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area? Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring. “Interesting,” I remarked. Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work. I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from. I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight. Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests. Indeed, reading and ...

Will Smarter Lawyers End Frivolous Lawsuits?

How do you know if a lawyer is any good? Of course, they've all passed the bar, but now their profession is lowering it. While most of us strive for excellence, and raise our children to value this virtue, prominent legal educators are establishing a new quality intitiative for their profession. Who says that lawyers can't reform themselves? Perhaps, we physicians can follow their bold example and raise the credentials of our pre-medical students. I’ll present the facts. You be the judge. I have written a dozen posts on tort reform on this blog, which always generate spirited and adversarial retorts from attorneys and their supporters. They accuse me and other tort reform advocates of carrying water for insurance companies. They repeatedly point out that I know nothing about the legal system and are unqualified to opine on its flaws. They deride me when I argue that effective tort reform would reduce the practice of defensive medicine, despite the re...

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog