There is a general fascination with the medical profession. Consider how many television shows over past decades have had a medical motif. And today’s patients are so über-informed and empowered, that at times they dabble with the practice of medicine themselves as an avocation. When a patient, for example queries me about Barrett’s esophagus and dysplasia or if I intend to test them for H. pylori, a germ that resides in the stomach, then I know by their use of medical terminology that the office visit will be a "peer to peer” experience.
So, I’ll ask my erudite reader-practitioners to respond to
the following medical inquiry.
A patient is suffering from a chronic upset stomach (called dyspepsia)
nearly every day. The cause of the
condition cannot be ascertained, and the treatment options are wanting. Assume that the medical professional has
undertaken an appropriate evaluation and that no cause has been
discovered. Assume as well that there is
no established treatment for the condition. Nevertheless, it is commonplace for doctors
to offer various prescriptions to these patients.
If you were the doctor, which of the following would you
advise?
Tell the patient that there is no effective treatment for
his condition and that he will need to continue to live with it as best he can.
Tell the patient that, while there is no proven remedy, that
there are various medicines to consider that the he has prescribed to others. You recommend one of them.
My guess is that most readers and patients would prefer
option #2 for reasons that need not be explained. Most doctors and patients would rather do
something than nothing.
As medical professionals know, and often lament, there are
too many drugs being prescribed. We know
this and yet we physicians are the perpetrators. And, the public has an outsized appetite for
pharmaceuticals. This has proved to be
an unshakable cycle to break.
What could be wrong about offering a prescription to a patient
with unexplained dyspepsia?
- Physicians and patients should be guided by science and truth.
- It is not fair to expend resources on ineffective medicines
- It is not ethical to expose patients to risks of adverse reactions without any reasonable promise of benefit.
- Physicians should not serve as willing accomplices in the over-medication of our society.
- The medical profession and the public should come to terms that not every medical symptom has a pharmaceutical remedy.
So, what could be done for these patients? There is a rising role for integrative
medicine and other alternative medical practices for patients with unexplained
and unexplainable medical symptoms. And,
if a conventional doctor like me starts carping that those alternative folks
operate without data or proof, then point out that we medical doctors have been
doing this forever.
Comments
Post a Comment