Job Interviewing Techniques in Medicine and Beyond

It would seem self-evident that an applicant for a job should be scrupulously honest. First, it is the right thing to do. Secondly, in our digital era, one’s academic record can be accessed back to kindergarten. Yet, many applicants will embellish their credentials or claim a skill level that may exceed reality. Thirty years ago, I was applying for my first job in New Jersey after completing my 2 year gastroenterology (GI) fellowship. I was not competent to perform ERCP, a complex scope examination that GI practices desperately still want to add to their practices' skill sets. Yet, I was advised by a practicing GI physician to simply claim that I could do the procedure. Otherwise, he said, they would simply pass me by. I queried the practitioner on my proposed course of action after being hired if I were summoned to perform an ERCP. Decades later, I do not recall his response. I can imagine what my new employer’s response might have been upon discovering that I had misrepresented my skills..

Should Applicants or Employers Take a Polygraph?

How honest should an interviewer be with a job applicant? On the day that I wrote this, I read of a technique where an interviewer who is meeting a job applicant at a restaurant, secretly arranges for the applicant’s meal to be messed up in some way. The justification is to see how the applicant reacts in real time to an unforeseen and unfavorable event. It reminds me of my initial interview at NYU School of Medicine, when the interviewer, among other slippery questions, asked me “what is the death rate?” The correct answer, which I luckily knew, is 100%. Perhaps, this demonstration of my nimble intellect explains why they accepted me.

I do not support subterfuge in a job interview to gauge applicants’ behaviors. It’s certainly fair game to present hypotheticals, but outright trickery should be out of bounds. And, if an interviewer is overtly dishonest, can this person be trusted after the hire? If we sanction employer legerdemain, then should we not permit the applicant to play tricks on the interviewer to gauge his or her behavior and the company’s culture?

I’ve always played it straight. It’s all I know. As for the position in New Jersey referenced above, I didn't get the job. And, so my life in Cleveland began.

Comments

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so. The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals. In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist. Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings. Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape. Private equity (PE) firms have been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight. PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale. While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier. There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform. Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele. It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance. For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings? If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits? The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform. Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat. The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families. Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR). I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary. And it’s not a fair fight. You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine. I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient. You must think I am a magician or a savant. While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago. (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog