Skip to main content

The Coronavirus Pandemic Playbook - A Work in Progress


Life is so much easier when we can rely upon a playbook to guide us over and around obstacles.  Indeed, many professions are devoted to creating policies and procedures to help businesses, individuals and organizations navigate through rough currents.  In general, these prepared plans are created to address challenges that are either known from prior outbreaks or can reasonably be assumed to be potential adverse events.  For example, regions of the country that have suffered from natural disasters would be expected to have contingency plans in place to prepare for the next arrival of Mother Nature. 


Navigating Through Rough Currents

How comfortable it is when facing a dilemma to be able to pull a binder off the shelf for advice.
Of course, as anyone alive knows, we don’t have a binder, an advisor, a parent or a GOOGLE site that can reliably land us safely when confronted with adversity.  So many issues require us to rely upon our experience and judgement and to leap beyond our comfort boundary.  Over time this boundary expands.  This is what is regarded as ‘experience’.  And with experience, fewer challenges are unique, novel and perplexing as it is more likely that we have encountered them.

And then came COVID-19.  Yes, we have addressed pandemics before, but this was a mold breaker.  Health experts, economists, U.S. states, countries, counties, businesses and individuals have all offered differing opinions on how to react to this catastrophe.  And these differences have been brought into sharper relief in recent weeks.

Do you think it would be easy to achieve consensus on the following inquiries?
  • Should we lock down a country or opt instead to achieve herd immunity to protect the population and the economy?   England and Sweden, two western nations, were not following the ‘herd’ on this issue.
  • Who should wear a mask and when? What kind of mask?  Face shield?
  • How much national testing for coronavirus is sufficient?
  • What constitutes adequate scientific evidence for a treatment candidate to be tested in a clinical trial?
  • Should unproven medicines with toxicity be offered to ill patients?
  • Where should finite financial resources be allocated?  Who determines the winners and losers?
  • What is the definition of an essential business?
  • What is the intensity of a potential COVID-19 exposure that should shut down a factory?
  • What is the long and winding road to opening up an economy? 
  • How are disagreements on the pace and process of opening up the economy resolved?
  • What metric of ‘safe’ should be used before the economy begins to open and social distancing can be relaxed?
  • Is there a valid point that the ‘cure can be worse than the disease’?
Much of our response to the pandemic is based on sound public health principles along with sober advice from epidemiologists, scientists and health experts.  But so much of what we need to know is simply not known.  The playbook is incomplete.  A silver lining is that COVID-19 has added many chapters to the Pandemic Playbook, which will leave us much better prepared when another invisible enemy strikes us again.  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Medical Malpractice: The White Coat Wall of Silence

Photo Credit Leisure Guy, one of my most faithful commenters, opines that I am omitting an important aspect of the tort reform argument. He has implored me repeatedly to read a particular book that I suspect buttresses his views, but this worthy pursuit is simply not near the top of my priority pyramid. Since he’s retired, he enjoys the luxury of burrowing deeply into the base of his priority pyramid. With 4 tuitions to go, retirement is a distant mirage for me. I’m can be a ‘leisure guy’, but only in my dreams. I have written throughout this blog and elsewhere that there are too many frivolous lawsuits against physicians. I have admitted that caps on non-economic damages are not ideal, because they deny some worthy plaintiffs of complete compensation, but I support them because I believe they serve the greater good. I have ranted that there is no effective filter to screen out physicians who should never be invited to the litigation party in the first place. I believe that the...

When Should Doctors Retire?

I am asked with some regularity whether I am aiming to retire in the near term.  Years ago, I never received such inquiries.  Why now?   Might it be because my coiffure and goatee – although finely-manicured – has long entered the gray area?  Could it be because many other even younger physicians have given up their stethoscopes for lives of leisure? (Hopefully, my inquiring patients are not suspecting me of professional performance lapses!) Interestingly, a nurse in my office recently approached me and asked me sotto voce that she heard I was retiring.    “Interesting,” I remarked.   Since I was unaware of this retirement news, I asked her when would be my last day at work.   I have no idea where this erroneous rumor originated from.   I requested that my nurse-friend contact her flawed intel source and set him or her straight.   Retirement might seem tempting to me as I have so many other interests.   Indeed, reading and ...

Prostate Cancer Screening: Stop The PSA Train!

About 10 years ago, my dad was to see his general internist. I have always refrained from giving medical advice to my family, for all of the reasons why doctors should not treat or advise their relatives. But, on this occasion, I did give Dad some unsolicited advice, particularly as I knew that his physician fired the diagnostic testing trigger readily. “Dad, please make sure that he doesn’t check the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test.” Dad indicated that he would convey my concern to his doctor, who ran the test on him anyway. Apparently, he includes the PSA test as a matter of routine on all men over a certain age. Twenty-five years ago as a curious, but skeptical medical student, I learned about prostate cancer. I learned that every man will develop it if he lives long enough. I learned that most cases of prostate cancer remain silent and never interfere with the individual’s life. I learned that the treatment for these cancers involves either major surgery or radiation, both of ...