A few days before I wrote this, a patient had a complication
in my office. I have discussed on this
blog the distinction between a complication, which is a blameless event, and a
negligent act. In my experience, most
lawsuits are initiated against complications or adverse medical outcomes,
neither of which are the result of medical negligence. This is the basis for my strong belief that
the current medical malpractice system is unfair. It ensnares the innocent much more often that
it targets the negligent.
I performed a scope examination through one of the two
orifices that gastroenterologists routinely probe. In this instance, the scope was destined to
travel inside a patient’s esophagus on route to her stomach and into the first
portion of the small intestine. Sedation
was expertly administered by our nurse anesthetist (CRNA). The procedure was quickly and successfully
performed. The patient’s breathing
became very impaired and her oxygen level decreased markedly, a known and
uncommon complication of sedation medications.
We took the appropriate measures, but her low oxygen level did not
respond.
At that point, our experienced and calm CRNA decided to
intubate the patient by passing a breathing tube into her lungs, in the same
manner as is routinely performed prior to surgery. The RN on the case, an ICU veteran, showed
how quickly and superbly her medical skills and judgment could be recalled. In decades of medical practice, I had never
had a patient whose scoping test and sedation led to a breathing tube
insertion. Moreover, this procedure was performed in our outpatient ambulatory surgery center, not in the hospital, so drama like this is exceedingly rare.
Physicians prefer to see drama in the theater.
The patient’s oxygen level immediately returned to normal
and she was transferred to the hospital in stable condition. She was appropriately treated and discharged
after a few days.
I was so grateful to have a team in place that had the
skills to rescue a patient who was in a dire situation. I told this to them directly and they seemed
to regard the matter in a more routine manner than I did. They saved her life. Nothing routine about this, as I see it.
For nearly all of the patients we see in the office, our
staff is overqualified. But, once or
twice a year, we need these folks on site, locked and loaded.
Physicians and the rest of us need back up. Do you have a contingency plan in your job if
a crisis befalls you? Will you wait for
a catastrophe before implementing one?
We’ve all heard vignettes about cities who were warned about a dangerous
intersection, but failed to ask until a tragedy occurred.
Finally, if someone helps you out of the abyss, give the
credit to whom it is deserved. Conversely, if something goes wrong and it’s
your fault, do the right thing.
You've given me food for thought and a new question to ask before my endoscopy on Thursday; it will take place in the doc's office. Isn't the worst possible scenario what happened to Joan Rivers? I've had Propofol twice in the last two months with no adverse effects. If I have what they suspect, it would be a much better way to go......
ReplyDeleteI will make sure he knows that, and I will have a copy of my advance directives.
Barbara, I'm hoping for good news for you. All the best, MK
ReplyDeleteThe expert care is avoiding the tube, not placing it.
ReplyDelete@anonymous, respectfully, your comment is misguided.
ReplyDelete