MD Whistleblower

Every week, I am asked by patients if their heartburn medicine causes osteoporosis.  The most effective heartburn medicines are called proton pump inhibitors, or PPIs.  If you watch more than an hour of TV per week, then you have seen ads for some of them.   Nexium, Prilosec and Protonix are 3 examples of these medicines. Many of them are now available over-the-counter at reduced dosages.  Patients today are incredibly informed, and sometimes misinformed, about their medical conditions and their treatments.  Most of their information is from the internet, and it’s easy for patients to become unwittingly trapped in the world wide web. The information dangling in cyberspace is entirely unregulated.  Information can be made to appear authoritative and objective when it actually is a paid advertisement.  Many blogs may appear to function to inform the public, when their true purpose is to serve the corporation that sponsors it.  If you are learning about probiotics, for exampl

Racism and prejudice are endemic in America.  Many of us reflexively answer, No , if we are asked if we are prejudiced.  I don’t.  I say yes. While I do my best to give everyone a fair shake, I grew up in a white suburban family in the latter decades of the last century.   My friends, my parent’s friends and all those we associated with were all the same color.  In elementary school, there was but a single black girl in our classroom. Is it possible for a white kid to grow up surrounded by all of the overt and covert prejudicial and stereotypical influences and somehow emerge pure?   I don’t think so.   Prejudice today among those of us who consider ourselves to be enlightened is more subtle and often hard to recognize. I don’t want to overplay this here.  I often feel that a charge of prejudice with regard to race, gender, age or religion is spurious and is launched to advance a personal or a political agenda.  We all know this to be true and these instances deserve condemna

I was asked to consult on a 43-year old female with abnormal liver blood test results.  It took but a few minutes to determine that she was an alcoholic, which was the likely explanation for her abnormal blood results.  She drank several beers daily over several years. My diagnosis was alcoholism, but did the patient concur? “Do you feel that you are drinking excessively or do you have it under control,” I asked. She replied, “I’ve got it under control.” That sad reply indicated that the probability of helping her to help herself was zero.  Ultimately, the addict must forge a pathway to healing.  Sure, we can help, coach and support the effort, and we should.  But, no addict ever reached the Promised Land by force or persuasion. Pouring One for the Road Sure, we’ll got this patient out of the hospital, back into the cauldron of inexorable self-destruction.  Did we help her?  I don’t think so.  This is not like treating a urinary tract infection where healing requir

It’s Memorial Day tomorrow.  What is it exactly that we are charged to remember? Cole Slaw? Lighter Fluid? BBQ Sauce? My father was a member of the greatest generation, having served in the U.S. Navy for 39 months.  He was stationed in California and was never in combat, despite some apocryphal vignettes he regaled us with.  I’ve never served in the military and none of my friends have served.  If not for my job, I would have very scant exposure to military professionals.  I have numerous patients who have served in all branches of the military during the 1940's and 50's.  Many are true heroes who recall their service with understated modesty.  I have also cared for many Vietnam vets who still bear physical and psychological scars of a war we couldn’t win and should never have joined. Freedom is not free, a quote that moved me deeply when I first saw it on the Korean War Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C.  I know that Memorial Day has deep meaning fo

While I consider myself to be an ethical practitioner, I am not perfect, and neither is the medical profession. I will present a recurrent ethical dilemma to my fair and balanced readers and await their judgment. Our gastroenterology practice, like all of our competitors, has an open access endoscopy option.  This permits a physician to refer a patient to us for a colonoscopy, without the need for an initial office visit. Ready, Aim, Fire! Patients can also schedule procedures themselves, such as a screening colonoscopy, without a physician referral, if allowed by their insurance carriers.  These patients enjoy the convenience of  bypassing an office visit.   We agree that an office consultation should not be required for routine screening procedures or to evaluate minor gastrointestinal symptoms. Of course, if a patient wants to see us in the office in advance – and some do – we are happy to do so.  I enjoy these pre-op visits which allows me to develop some measu

Practicing physicians like me rely on scientific medical journals to keep us current on medical developments.  We learn about new treatments for old diseases.  New diagnostic tests are presented as alternatives to existing methods.   Established treatments, which are regarded as dogma, may be shown to be less effective or less safe than originally believed. It’s a confusing intellectual morass to sort among complex and conflicting studies some of which reach opposite conclusions in the same medical journal.  What’s a practicing physician to do? While the medical journals that physicians read are fundamental to our education, paradoxically most physicians have only rudimentary training in properly analyzing and assessing these studies.  For example, the quality of medical studies often depends upon statistical analysis, a mathematical field that is foreign to most practicing physicians.   Doctors like me hope that our peer-reviewed journal editors have done their due diligence