MD Whistleblower

Medical ethical issues confront physicians daily.  Most of us contemplate ponderous ethical dilemmas, such as end-of-life care care, allocation of the limited supply of organs for transplant or our unequal access to health care.  Many ethical decision points are rather quotidian, not situations that would serve as content for bioethical conferences. Here are some examples of everyday ethical issues that physicians deal with. A patient asks his doctor to support a claim for disability that is not warranted. A patient asks his gastroenterologist to change his constipation diagnosis after the fact so that his colonoscopy is covered more fully by the insurance company.  An employee in a doctor’s office, whose own doctor is booked solid, requests an antibiotic prescription for a urinary tract infection from her physician boss. A physician falsely claims to an insurance company that he has tried certain medicines on a patient in order to gain approval of a desired medication. A

The value of anything becomes apparent when it is taken away from you.  Nothing profound here about one of life’s central truths.  It is an ongoing challenge not to take life’s gifts for granted.  I have never known hunger or lived without shelter. I have never been unemployed or suffered a serious illness. I pay my bills.  I have 5 children who enjoy excellent health and are forging pathways toward their dreams.  I love the people I work with.  I have found new love in the 6 th decade of life.  And, I have ice cream every day of my life. It would be shameful to have been bestowed so much and then to complain about some of life’s trivialities.  But, I am human. The Mother of All Gifts Consider the following list of events.  Has any of them ever dampened your mood, made you angry or resulted in an outburst of coarse language?  You find yourself in a traffic jam which delays your arrival to a meeting by 20 minutes. Your lengthy and detailed e-mail to a client suddenl

“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”   There is much truth in this quotation of uncertain provenance.  We see this phenomenon regularly in the medical profession.  We see it in medical journals when statistics are presented in a manner that exaggerates the benefit of a treatment or a diagnostic test.  Massaging numbers is raised to an art form by the pharmaceutical companies who will engage in numerical gymnastics to shine a favorable light on their product.   It’s massaging, not outright mendacity.   The promotional material that pharmaceutical representatives present to doctors is riddled with soft deception. A favorite from their bag of tricks is to rely upon relative value rather than absolute value.  Here’s how this works in this hypothetical example. A drug named Profitsoar is tested to determine if it can reduce the risk of a heart attack.  Two thousand patients are participating in the study.  Each patients receives either Profitsoar or a

Like nearly every gastroenterologist, we have an open access endoscopy system.  This means that patients can be referred, or refer themselves, directly to our office for a a procedure without an office visit in advance. Why do we do this?  We offer it as a convenience so patients do not need to make two visits to see us when it is clear that a procedure is necessary.  For example, a referring physician doesn't need our consultative advice for his 50-year-old patient with rectal bleeding.  He just needs us to do a colonoscopy.  We have a strict screening process in place to verify that these patients are appropriate for our one-stop colonoscopy program.  If we have concerns about medical issues or potential informed consent capability, then we arrange for these patients to see us in advance. However, no screening process is perfect.  On occasion, someone shows up whom we might have preferred to see in our office first. How should we handle these situations?  We don't a

I am in coffee shops several times per week.  I prefer independent establishments with atmosphere and authenticity.  For that reason, it is rare to spot me in a retail coffee outlet whose HQ is in Seattle, Washington.  This past week, as I was carrying my café mocha to my table, I spied some board games stacked up on a table.  On top was the game pictured below. This brought back warm memories of playing this game as a young kid.  It recalled the wholesome and beautiful childhood that my parents gave me.  Millennials might not appreciate the raw and fierce competition of games such as Candyland, Chinese checkers or Trouble, which has caused a huge void in their lives.  Looking back and remembering gives meaning to our lives.  We remember a song, a joke, a celebration, a concert, a speech and relationships.  Isn’t it amazing how hearing a song from years ago captures a mood? This weekend, we remember and ponder something of infinite meaning and importance.  We remembe

Patients are amazing creatures.   The current breed is hyperinformed on medical information and has an ever expanding reservoir of physician data to trove through.  I’m not just referring to physician reviews on Angie’s list.  Soon, the public will be encouraged to review our success and failure rates with respect to medical treatments, how much cash the drug companies grease us with, all disciplinary actions, comparison with peers, complication rates, medical malpractice entanglements and how much Medicare reimbursement we have received. There will be published quality benchmarks on physicians so that the public can see how their physicians scored on these various quality measurements.  I have opined throughout this blog that I feel that these measurements are tantamount to taurine excrement.   Sadly, reimbursement will be tied to these results with physicians who don’t rate high enough having some of their income confiscated.  Physicians who don’t make the grade may game the syst

Physicians are expected to be hostile to insurance companies.  Indeed, a prior Whistleblower post directed arrows in their direction.  They are an easy target, often vilified for their greed and perceived indifference toward those they insure.  Ask most of us if we think insurance companies favor profits over patients, and most of us will respond that profits prevail. Insurance companies are businesses, not charitable undertakings.  Sure, we all like free stuff.  Or, if it’s not free, we prefer that someone else pays for it.  We are outraged at the costs of chemotherapy, hepatitis C treatment and biologic treatments such as Humira and Remicade, leaving aside the zillions of dollars it takes to research, develop, manufacture, market and monitor innovative new drugs.  We want to drive a Cadillac, but only pay for a Chevy. We want to pay for this... ...and drive this. No person, business or organization is wrong all of the time.  Consider the following practices.